Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Minutes · Feb 9, 2023

February 9, 2023 Special Meeting

Preserved file SHA-2561c10e034bfdf67167120d180e97094d6bdfcc29c0e0c173a6970d5f1b45aaea1

Indexed text

Page 1

MINUTES TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING February 9, 2023 8:00 P.M. The West Orange Zoning Board of Adjustment held a Special Meeting on February 9, 2023, commencing at 8:00 PM utilizing the virtual Zoom platform. Chairperson Philip D. Neuer called the meeting to order at approximately 8:02 PM. It was announced that notification of this meeting was given to the Township Clerk, the West Orange, Chronicle, and the Star Ledger and posted on the Township Bulletin Board in accordance with the “Senator Byron M. Baer Open Public Meetings Act.” Chairperson Philip D. Neuer asked everyone to please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Alice Beirne, Esq. Board Attorney read the opening statement. ROLL CALL Present: William Michael Barbee (8:22 PM arrival), Jerome Eben, Philip D. Neuer, Peter Scalora, Irv Schwarzbaum, Brent D. Scott, Mark Sussman, Alice Weiss Absent: Peter Ricci (excused) Also Present: Paul Grygiel, Consulting Planner for the Township John Hess, Consulting Engineer for the Township Alice Beirne, Esq., Board Attorney Diana L. Chandler, Board Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS Future Meetings: February 16, 2023 (Regular Meeting) March 16, 2023 (Regular Meeting) April 20, 2023 (Regular Meeting) SWEARING IN Township Professionals Mr. Paul Grygiel and Mr. John Hess were sworn under oath. Mr. Marc Sussman (Alternate #3) and Mr. Brent D. Scott (Board Member) were sworn under oath due to their reappointment/appointment to the Zoning Board.

Page 2

APPLICATION 1.) ZB- 21-21 Daughters of Israel Inc. (1155 Pleasant Valley Way) (Carried from 1/19/2023) Block:171; Lot:12; Zone: R-2 1155 Pleasant Valley Way Seeking C1, C2, and D Variances with preliminary and final site plan approval to redevelop the campus into a continuum of care community offering independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing components. e PREVIOUS MEETING (12/15/22) EXHIBITS e (KDA Architectural Exhibit Al— Dated 11/2/2022) e A-2a- Existing Site Plan: An explanation of the conditions on the property. e A-2b- Proposed Site Plan: To reinvent Daughters of Israel to active adult amenities community from solely assisted living with 182 apartments 22 assisted living and 80 skilled nursing rooms. e A-2c- Lower-Level Plan: parking garage, fitness center, support space, and Independent Living Apartment Units e A-2d- First Floor Plan (Main Level): Independent Living Apartment Units, Common Spaces, Suite Acute Households, Support Spaces square footage of residential and administration services e A-2e- Second Floor Plan: Independent Living Apartment Unit households for skilled nursing e A-2f- Third Floor Plan e A-2g- Fourth Floor Plan: Independent Living Apartment Units and skilling nursing units e A-2h- Roof Plan: solar panels and a green roof area with screening examples e A-2i- Southwest, South, and East Elevations e A-2j- Site Section A - Independent Living & Health Center Facing South e A-2k- Site Section B - Independent Living & Health Center Facing Southwest e A-2I- Site Section C — Independent Living & Health Center Facing Southwest A-2m- Site Section D — Independent Living Facing West A-2n- Street View North — Pleasant Valley Way (Winter) A-2o0- Street View North — Pleasant Valley Way (Summer) A-2p- Street View South — Pleasant Valley Way (Winter) A-2q- Street View South — Pleasant Valley Way (Summer) A-2r- Existing View Looking South (Winter) A-2s- Existing View Looking South (Summer) A-2t- View Looking South (Winter) A-2u- View Looking South (Summer) A-2v- Existing View from West Neighborhood (Winter) A-2w- Existing View from West Neighborhood A-2x- View from West Neighborhood (Winter) A-2y — View from West Neighborhood (Summer) A-2z - Main Entry View A-2aa — Landscape Plan A-2bb- Sign Location Plan eecoeeeoeeoeoee ee eee

Page 3

A-2cc- Phase One, Phase Two, Phase Three, and Four: where Mr. Fowles testified that in total it will be six (6) years of construction if all phases proceed as expected. PRESENTATION - Mr. Howard Geneslaw, Esq. entered on record on behalf of the applicant. He gave a brief synopsis of previous testimony. - Mr. David Stafford CFO, Daughters of Israel was sworn under oath. BOARD QUESTIONS - Mrs. A. Weiss thanked Mr. Stafford for listening to her concerns regarding the amount of time for construction. - Mr. B. Scott asked what brought on a change in construction time. Mr. Stafford stated that it was to bring closer to where the Board needs it to be. Mr. Scott asked if there is a way to proceed with the application without cutting down any trees. Mr. Stafford said that Mr. Petry, Civil Engineer would be the better person to answer this question. - Mr. IL. Schwarzbaum asked for confirmation on how many phases there are for this project and the length of time for the completion. Mr. Stafford stated that there are now three (3) phases and it should take somewhere between six (6) to eight (8) years for completion. NO PROFESSIONALS QUESTIONS NO PUBLIC ADVOCATE QUESTIONS PUBLIC QUESTIONS - Mr. Richard Webster, Esq on behalf of Loren Svetvilas (699 Prospect Avenue) asked who owns the site. Mr. Stafford said that Daughters of Israel is owned by the Jewish Committee Foundation. Mr. Webster asked who pays taxes on the property. Mr. Stafford confirmed that Daughters of Israel does. Mr. Webster followed up by asking Why do Daughters of Israel pay taxes if it is a nonprofit organization. Mr. Stafford stated that he believes it is because of a cell tower on some of the property which predates him. Mr. Webster asked if the independent living component is profit- generating. Mr. Stafford stated that it is anticipated to exceed the operating expenses. Mr. Webster asked if the skilled nursing dementia unit would bring a profit. Mr. Stafford stated that while the Medicaid units will bring a loss but all others will exceed expenses. - Kevin Malanga (57 Ridge Road) asked if the facility is losing money. Mr. Stafford stated that currently the facility is losing money but it varies on the economy. Mr. Malanga asked for confirmation of Mr. Halper’s testimony regarding the Daughters of Israel losing one million dollars. Mr. Stafford said if Mr. Halper was looking at 2021 numbers

Page 3

s on the economy. Mr. Malanga asked for confirmation of Mr. Halper’s testimony regarding the Daughters of Israel losing one million dollars. Mr. Stafford said if Mr. Halper was looking at 2021 numbers that is true. Mr. Malanga asked if one million dollars was lost in 2022 Mr. Stafford answered in the affirmative. Mr. Malanga stated that, in saving four years of construction by eliminating Phase 4, what part of the building is being eliminated? Mr. Stafford deferred to the Architect and Engineer. - Mr. Phil Litwinoff (11 Linden Avenue) asked why Daughters of Israel is not choosing to do this build-out on their Whippany property and Mr. Stafford stated that he is not

Page 4

sure. Mr. Litwinoff'asked how eliminating 10 percent (10%) of the population will affect parking. Mr. Stafford deferred to the Traffic Engineer. Mr. Steve Burkat (14 Rand Drive) wanted to ask a question about trees and a sight line. Chairperson Neuer said that Mr. Stafford is not the expert to be asking the question to. Ms. Renee Faibis (24 Skyline Drive) asked if 2023 is expected to have a deficit. Mr. Stafford answered in the affirmative. Ms. Sally Malanga (57 Ridge Road) asked what the primary purpose of the change is regarding marketplace function. Mr. Stafford said that the purpose of Daughters of Israel is to serve Jewish people in need. Ms. Malanga asked if the mission is not geared to serve Jewish people in need, then what kind of need are they serving. Mr. Stafford said they are serving those wanting to live in a Jewish facility. Ms. Joyce Rudin (38 Woodland Avenue) asked about the noise levels of the construction. Mr. Stafford said that was not part of his testimony. Mr. Richard Webster, Esq on behalf of Loren Svetvilas (699 Prospect Avenue) asked, in regards to this being a “state-of-the-art facility” if they are aware of the “greenhouse model. Mr. Stafford responded and stated that greenhouse models usually have shorter hallways to accommodate up to about twenty (20) people with a country kitchen. BOARD FOLLOW UP Mr. B. Scott asked if this rehabilitation is for profit. Mr. Stafford said no. PRESENTATION Mr. J. Michael Petry, Civil Engineer entered on the record on behalf of the applicant and requalified as an expert with confirmation of no changes to credentials. Mr. Petry referred to Exhibit A-3 (V4 — 16 Civil Engineering Exhibits) Where the elimination of Phase 4 to locate the Northeastern of the building on the south of the loading dock was presented. The timeline in between phases has changed to two (2) months as opposed to six (6) months. The amount of 163 units instead of the original 182 units proposed. Mr. Petry testified that they have worked with the forester Mr. Kip and Mr. Hess to help relocate utilities (For example: relocating a running pipe helped maintain trees.) Chairperson Neuer confirmed that these exhibits have been added to the evidence. Break 9:39 PM-9:47 PM BOARD QUESTIONS Chairperson Never asked if there are trees in the same area as Phase 4 in case the applicant wants to build out in the future. Mr. Petry

Page 4

n added to the evidence. Break 9:39 PM-9:47 PM BOARD QUESTIONS Chairperson Never asked if there are trees in the same area as Phase 4 in case the applicant wants to build out in the future. Mr. Petry said no. Chairperson Neuer asked if they will be adding 40 trees in other spaces. Mr. Peiry said that he is adding trees despite not moving a building. Chairperson Neuer asked if there is a landscape plan to install/maintain trees. Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative. Mr. J. Eben asked about the sizes of projects/properties in percentages of the construction management services that Mr. Petry’s office provides. Mr. Petry said that his office offers support to assist in technicalities. Mr. Eben asked where parking was

Page 5

going to be during construction. Mr. Petry said that parking will be offsite and most likely at the armory. - Mr. B. Scott commended Mr. Petry for saving trees and asked about the detention pond and the reasoning behind not changing it. Mr. Peiry said that it is currently undersized and there is only one currently on site Mr. Scott asked for particulars regarding the Traffic study which Mr. Petry deferred to the Traffic Engineer. Mr. Scott asked about the difference between cool roofing and green roofing. Mr. Petry explained that a cool roof is mainly about the color and a green roof deals with organics used in the construction of and on the roof. Mr. Scott asked about the retaining wall in the parking lot and how it is supported. Mr. Petry explained that the retaining wall is in the southeast corner of the building and has nothing to do with the parking lot. Mr. Scott asked what materials would be used regarding this retaining wall. Mr. Peiry said that the wall would be made with modulate block and precast block and referenced the detail sheet. Mr. Scott asked about the noise around the facility and what the plan is. Mr. Petry said that the state and town have standards that all of the equipment will meet those requirements. PROFESSIONALS QUESTIONS - No questions from Mr. Hess. - Mr. P. Grygiel suggested for the applicant confirm that the numbers on the plans are correct. PUBLIC ADVOCATE QUESTIONS - Mr. Thapar asked about the number of major trees being removed. Mr. Petry said that 110 major trees and 39 minor trees are being removed. Mr. Thapar asked how that criterion was determined. Mr. Petry said that one of the main factors was going on-site walks with the Town Forester, Mr. Walt Kipp. PUBLIC QUESTIONS - Mr. Kevin Malanga (57 Ridge Road) asked about the 67-foot fagade height of the current building facing Pleasant Valley Way and if Mr. Petry thinks it will affect the footprint of the building. Mr. Petry answered in the negative. - Mr. Malanga asked if there are any other buildings with dimensions of 60 feet along Pleasant Valley Way. Mr. Petry said no. - Mr. Malanga asked about tree removal; the substantial cluster of trees and whether or not they can be saved. Mr. Petry said no. - Mr. Malanga asked if the trees at the detention basin can be saved and if they can be reconfigured. Mr. Petry said no. - Mr. Richard Friedman (11 Kovak Court)

Page 5

they can be saved. Mr. Petry said no. - Mr. Malanga asked if the trees at the detention basin can be saved and if they can be reconfigured. Mr. Petry said no. - Mr. Richard Friedman (11 Kovak Court) asked how close will the tree cutting be to Hunt Court. Mr. Petry said that tree cutting will take place approximately 80 feet below the Kessler Institute property line. - Mr. Richard Webster, Esq on behalf of Loren Svetvilas (699 Prospect Avenue) asked if the detention basin can be deeper in a smaller footprint. Mr. Petry said no because it is at its maximum depth because of state law. - Mr. Webster asked if the parking study includes workers, residents, and visitors. Mr. Petry said that the study mainly has to do with the number of workers and bed count.

Page 6

- Mr. Webster asked about the capacity of the theatre and pub. Mr. Petry said that it is not going to be an independent theatre; it is only for the use of residents and guests. - Mr. Webster asked about the heights in terms of floors. Mr. Petry said that there will be five (5) exposed stories and deferred final testimony to the architect. - Mr. Robert Rashkes (35 Oakcrest Road) asked if the sidewalks will be concrete. Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative and explained that the sidewalk will be at the south entrance to the front door. Mr. Rashkes asked if this will continue across Pleasant Valley Way. Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative and confirmed that they will also be in concrete with handicapped access as well. - Mr. Rashkes asked if there will be a grass island. Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative. Mr. Rashkes asked if there will be pedestrian crossing signs for the driveways. Mr. Petry said no. Mr. Rashkes asked if there will be crosswalk lights. Mr. Petry said no. - Mr. Rashkes asked about air purification. Mr. Petry deferred this question to the architect. Chairperson Neuer announced that application ZB-21-21 Daughters of Israel is being carried to the February 16, 2023, regular meeting with no further notice. Chairman Neuer adjourned the meeting at 10:58 PM. Adopted: 6/15/2023 ‘handler, Secretary

File revisions (1)