Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Feb 4, 2026

West Orange Fourth Round HEFSP_adopted 111025_Appendices

Preserved file SHA-256bb8ec7b235e39ac013717e0d4aeabdee293a925171ae3bdeed405adeac15eea9

Indexed text

Page 458

10. 11. 13. 14. 15. The existing building is setback 125.7 feet from the eastern (front) property line on Main Street, 6.8 feet from the rear property line and 12.9 feet and 8.6 feet from the northern and southern property lines respectively. No changes to the footprint of the existing building are proposed. The area surrounding the subject property is a retail business district and to the rear are one-family residences. Applicant presented testimony from its engineer, Donna Bullock, that of the six properties on either side of the property in question on Main Street, four were taller than the proposed building. The front yard of the building is currently paved and striped with parking stalls- plans show the parking stalls arranged into two rows along the northern and southern sides of the front yard with 20 standard parking spaces, two (2) parking spaces and one ADA van-accessible space for a total parking space count of 25 spaces (which includes the EV credit). There is a gradual decrease in grade from the rear to the front of the site and to accommodate this change in grade, there is an existing paved area around the front and side perimeter of the building. The first floor will be subdivided into two separate office spaces, each with separate entrances. Applicant’s representative, Maurice Cox, testified that one of the offices will house his medical business (True Allied) which is currently located at 105 Main Street and the other space will be dedicated office space. The current building is dilapidated and is just a shell- Applicant seeks to rehabilitate the existing building to create a more aesthetically pleasing and useful building.

Page 459

17. 18. 20. 22. 23. 24. Applicant proposes to gut the existing interior of the building and to construct a new 3,229 sq. ft. third floor with a floor area of 2,950 sq. ft. The entry to the residential units on the 24 and 3" floor will be accessible from the existing staircase that will extend to the new third floor. There are three (3) apartments proposed on the 2" floor, including two(2) two-bedroom apartments measuring 1,034 square feet and 1,100 square feet and one studio apartment measuring 600 square feet. There are four (4) apartments proposed for the third floor, including two (2) one- bedrooms, each measuring 800 square feet, and two (2) studios each measuring 600 square feet. In response to questions from the Board and public regarding emergency egress from the third floor, Applicant modified the plans to include fire escapes as required by Ordinance and which are Code compliant and do not require a variance. Testimony from the Applicant’s architect, Jason Peist, confirmed that the building did not require an elevator due as the building square footage does not exceed the requirements where an elevator would be required. With the proposed third floor, the building’s height will be 34.5 feet, which is within the allowable building height for the zone. The exterior improvements include an updated fagade with stone and wood for a clean and contemporary look. In response to concerns from members of the public regarding privacy concerns, Applicant agreed to install privacy film on the third-floor rear windows. The roof design includes a parapet wall to hide the HVAC equipment, and the Applicant modified the plans (dated June 17, 2025) to move the HVAC equipment to

Page 460

25. 26. 27. 28. be positioned closer to the front of the building with a sound insulation partition wall to minimize sound to the rear neighbors. A mechanical lift for ADA accessibility will be provided in front of the building from the parking lot. The proposed parking lot originally provided 22 standard parking spaces but was changed at the request of the Board to remove one space to allow for safer turning egress, one ADA space and two EV spaces (where one was originally proposed), therefore, 25 parking spaces are provided on site. The Board Engineer, Phillip Scott, P.E., C.M.E. pointed out that the proposed ADA parking space would not have the required slope and therefore Applicant agreed to a condition that the parking lot would be re-graded to provide the required slope for the ADA parking space. Applicant requested the following waivers from the Township Site Plan/Subdivision Checklist Items: 9 (certification blocks), 10 (monumentation), 11 (date of current survey), 13 (metes and bounds description), 14 (acreage), 18 (Location and dimensions of any existing or proposed streets), 20 (Copy and/or delineation of any existing or proposed deed restrictions), 23 (List of required regulatory approvals or permits), 30 (Topographical features of subject property from USGS map), 31 (Existing and proposed contour intervals based on U.G.S. & G.S. datum), 36 (Proposed utility infrastructure plans, including sanitary sewer, water, storm water management, telephone, electric and cable TV), 39 (Spot and finish elevations at all property corners), 40 (Construction details as required by Ordinance), 49 (Vehicular and

Page 461

pedestrian circulation patterns), and 52 (Plans and legal documents for compliance with West Orange COAH). 29. Applicant’s request for waivers of checklist Items 9 through 11 are not applicable because there is no subdivision associated with the application and 18, 23, 30, and 31, have either been satisfied by the Applicant or are not applicable as per the reports of Phillip Scott, P.E.,C.M.E. dated April 1, 2025 and Gerard Haizel, P.P. dated April 2, 2025. 30. | The Application requires the following variance relief from the Board: SECTION/REQUIREMENT | PERMITTED/REQUIRED | PROPOSED 25.7.1 Maximum Building 2.5 Stories/35-feet 3-Stories/34.5-feet Height/Stories 25- 7.1 Minimum Rear Yard 30-feet 6.8-feet (Existing Non- Setback Conforming) 25-7.1 Maximum Lot 75% 87.2% (Existing Non- Coverage Conforming Condition) 31. _N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46a. and b. and N.J.S.A. 40:55D-50a. govern the Board’s review of the preliminary and final site plan application. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46a provides that an “ordinance requiring site plan review and approval shall require the developer submit to the administrative officer a site plan and such other information as is reasonably necessary to make an informed decision as to whether the requirements necessary for preliminary site plan approval have been met.” N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46a further provides that “The site plan and any engineering documents to be submitted shall be required in tentative form for discussion purposes for preliminary approval. If any architectural plans are required to be submitted for site plan approval, the preliminary plans and

Page 462

32. elevations shall be sufficient.” N.J.S.A. 50:55D-46b provides that “if the planning board required any substantial amendment in the layout of improvements proposed by the developer that have been the subject of a hearing, an amended application for development shall be submitted and proceeded upon, as in the case of the original application for development” and “the planning board shall, if the proposed development complies with the ordinance and this act, grant preliminary site plan approval.” N.J.S.A. 40:55D-50a. provides that final site plan approval “shall” be granted if the detailed drawings, specifications, and estimates of the application conform to the standards of all applicable ordinances and the conditions of preliminary approval. As such if the applicant meets the standards set forth in the ordinances, the planning board lacks the authority to deny approval of the site plan and subdivision, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-50a; PRB_Enters., Inc. _v. S. Brunswick Planning Bd., 105 N.J. 1, 7 (1987); Dunkin' Donuts of N.J., Inc. v. Twp. of N. Brunswick Planning Bd., 193 N.J. Super. 513, 515 (App. Div. 1984). Conversely, if the application does not comply with all ordinance requirements, the Board must deny approval. Cortesini v. Hamilton Planning Board, 417 N.J. Super. 201, 215 (App. Div. 2010). However, there are two exceptions: (1) The first exception is where an application does not comply with all ordinance requirements but the Board grants relief in terms of variances or exceptions. In that case, the Board then must review the application against all remaining ordinance requirements and grant approval if the application complies with all such remaining requirements. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-60 permits a planning board to grant variances from the bulk regulations of a zoning ordinance and other zoning deviations that do not require a “d”

Page 463

variance as part of site plan or subdivision review. The variance proofs are the same as for “c” variances as set forth in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70. A c (2) variance may be granted when the purposes of zoning are advanced and the benefits of deviating from the ordinance requirements outweigh any detriments. The benefits derived from granting a “¢ (2)” variance must include benefits to the community as a whole, not just the applicant or property owner A “c” variance must address the “negative criteria,” and affirmatively demonstrate that the variance can be granted “without substantial detriment to the public good” and “without substantial impairment to the intent and purpose of the zone plan and zoning ordinance” of the municipality. NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Board reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. The requested variances for rear lot setback and maximum lot coverage satisfy the c (1) criteria as these are pre-existing conditions that have existed since the building was constructed at a time when the Code permitted such conditions. 2. The variance for the third story satisfies the c (2) criteria because the project as a whole advances the purpose of the MLUL as the project presents special reasons under the MLUL N.J.S.A. 40:55D-2, specifically paragraphs a) advancing the general welfare because the building is being restored and renovated; g) provides sufficient space for a variety of residential and commercial uses with easy access to public amenities, is ina walkable location which creates less reliance on automobiles; i.) provides a desirable visual environment by bringing the building more into harmony with the surrounding area and providing aesthetic enhancements to both the building and parking area; and

Page 464

m) promotes more efficient use of the land because restoration of the building, rather than fully demolishing the building, has a lesser negative effect. The benefits of the project outweigh any negatives and present no substantial detriment to the public good. Waivers for items number: 9 (certification blocks), 10 (monumentation), 11 (date of current survey), 13 (metes and bounds description), 14 (acreage), 18 (proposed streets), 21 (proposed easements), 22 (development stages), 23 (regulatory approvals), 30 (topographical features), 31(contour intervals), 32 (wooded areas), 34 (drainage area map), 39 (soil erosion and sediment control plan), 40 (construction details), 41 (road and paving cross-sections), 42 (proposed street names), and 43 (new block and lot numbers), are appropriate because the above items are not applicable to the proposed project. (Applicant’s request for waiver of items 20 and 52 are denied as the project includes affordable housing.) Seo NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Board of the Township of West Orange that approval for Preliminary and Final Major site plan with requested waivers of Items Numbered 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 21, 22, 23, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, and 45, and with c variances is granted to; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval granted to 172-174 Main Street, LLC, is subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Township, County, State and Federal laws, ordinances, regulations, and directives, including without limitation, obtaining all applicable local, state, and federal approvals, or permits. If another governmental entity

Page 465

or agency grants a waiver or a variance affecting the plans and/or exhibits submitted by the Applicant, this approval or the conditions attached to it, then the Applicant shall re-apply to this Board respecting the same and this Board shall have the right to view that issue as it relates to this approval and these conditions and modify and amend same, if appropriate. In the event that any other required regulatory approval conflicts with the terms and conditions hereof, or materially alters the same, or the terms and conditions hereof are materially altered by any change in applicable law or regulation other than those municipal regulations for which change is prohibited by the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), or in the event Applicant or its successor or assigns construct or attempt to construct any improvement in conflict with or in violation of the terms of this approval, the Board hereby reserves the right to withdraw, amend or supplant the instant approval. All construction, use and development of the property shall be in conformance with the plans approved herein, all representations of the Applicant and its witnesses during the public hearing, all exhibits introduced by the Applicant, and all terms and conditions of this resolution. The Applicant shall pay all outstanding application fees and technical review fees, board attorney fees for preparation of the resolution, as well as any inspection fees that may be required hereunder. The Applicant shall pay any additional fees or escrow deposits which may be due and owing within thirty (30) days of the notification or this approval shall be deemed withdrawn.

Page 466

10. 13; 16. 17. All notes included in the approved plans, including notes required by this Resolution, shall be deemed conditions of approval having the same force and effect as conditions expressly set forth in this Resolution. Applicant agrees to abide by all of the suggestions and directives set forth in the Matrix Report dated August 13, 2024, and April 1, 2025, and June 30, 2025, unless expressly modified by the terms of this Resolution. Applicant will abide by the Township Tree Ordinance. A white roof will be constructed. The HVAC units on the roof of the building will be moved and consolidated at the front of the building (so to provide consideration to the neighbors behind the building.) Applicant shall install and maintain a sound insulation partition wall to muffle the sound of the HVAC system on the roof. No portion of the building may be used as an event space. Applicant agrees to fully comply with the noise ordinance. Applicant will mill, replace and restripe the entire parking lot. The proposed lighting will not have any spillage onto neighboring properties. Applicant agrees to clean out and confirm, to the satisfaction of the Township Engineer, that the existing storm water system is functioning as intended. There shall be no exterior lights at the rear of the building. All debris on site will be cleaned up and the site will be properly maintained free from debris.

Page 467

18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. The parking spaces will consist of 1 ADA space, 2 EV spaces, 21 standard spaces (so that one space at the front will be removed to allow better turning into and out of the site.) Applicant will install and maintain car bumper stops to keep vehicles from over- hanging onto the walkway. Applicant will re-grade the slope for the ADA parking space and will submit plans showing that re-grading to the Township Engineer for approval. Trench drain grates will be repaired or replaced to make sure they lay flat. Applicant must replace the current wooden fence and replace the fence with a concrete or block wall. Applicant will install a fence or some other control to prevent neighbors from parking in the parking lot. Applicant must supply the lighting fixture table. Applicant must supply the sewer calculations to the Township Engineer to demonstrate if there is sufficient sewer capacity and shall submit plans that show the connection point and that the lateral can handle the sewer connection (and any other calculations to satisfy 217 of the Matrix April 1, 2025 addendum report). Applicant must change the sewer pipes from 8” to 12”. Applicant shall submit the grading plan for the driveway apron. The Fire Sub Code Official shall evaluate the parking lot for fire lanes markings and Applicant shall abide by the direction of the Fire Code Official regarding that necessary striping. Applicant shall submit a full-sized sheet demonstrating the sight triangle.

File revisions (1)