Supporting Documentation · Jun 18, 2026
26 03 25 516 Pleasant Valley Way Planning Review 2
7171e83e41b55455fa455063c13f4f10280f420790689e1e03f945d02b169fa2Indexed text
ive Criteria: The applicant must show that the variance can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the zone plan. i. The applicant should confirm that the existing and proposed building expansion are 2.5 stories in height, rather than 3 stories. The Township’s definition of a “half story” is: “STORY, HALF — Shall mean an area under a sloping roof with less than 60% but more than 25% of its total floor area having a minimum ceiling height of seven feet six inches and with no portion of the area used for residential living purposes having a minimum ceiling height of less than three feet six inches.” Calculations have been provided verifying that the upper level of the building can be considered a “half story”.
West Orange Zoning Board March 26, 2026 Re: 127 Mitchell Street, LLC (516 Pleasant Valley Way) Our File No. 115.WRZ0154.V01 Planning Review #2 Page 8 j. In the case of any d-1 or d-2 variance, the bulk standards that have been adopted for the particular district, in this case those of the OB-1 district, were adopted with the intent to apply to those uses that are expressly permitted. When the ordinance was drafted it was not necessarily contemplated that this particular use might be proposed for a site in the OB-1 district. The standards of the OB-1 district are not necessarily intended to apply to a mixed-use building or apartments. In these cases, bulk variances related to specific requirements of the OB-1 district can be considered subsumed within the Board’s consideration of the ‘d’ variance. The Zoning Board can at its reasonable discretion determine appropriate bulk standards such as building setbacks and buffering requirements. k. The applicant should provide testimony addressing the lack of buffering, and any efforts that can be made to enhance the buffer between the site and the adjacent residential uses to the east, where currently only a row of arbor-vitae is proposed. l. The applicant should address the required open space set-aside for the site, and confirm the total proposed building area so that the required open space can be determined. Calculations have been provided. m. The applicant should address the screening of the air conditioning units. Will there be any new mechanical equipment outside of or on top of the building expansion? A fence is now proposed. However, it is not clear what type of fence is proposed. Will this be the 6-foot high vinyl privacy fence that is detailed on Sheet 8 of the site plans? The applicant should clarify. n. The applicant should clarify whether there will be any differentiation between employee parking for the office uses, and resident parking. o. The applicant should address anticipated demand for parking during peak hours, and in evenings. The Township code does permit shared parking as proposed, but there are no provisions in the code that permit a reduction in parking based on potential lack of overlap among the shared users, as can sometimes be the case between residences that typically use parking at night, while office users that require parking during the day. p. The applicant should address any green
the shared users, as can sometimes be the case between residences that typically use parking at night, while office users that require parking during the day. p. The applicant should address any green design measures being taken to enhance the sustainability of the project. q. Per §25-13.3.c, where any ‘d’ variance is required, at the discretion of the Zoning Board an environmental impact statement may be required of an application. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has now been provided. r. In the applicant’s response letter it is stated that additional landscaping is proposed to screen the dumpster area. However the landscaping plan provided with the revised site plan drawings does not appear to show any additional plantings compared to the initial submission. The applicant should clarify.
West Orange Zoning Board March 26, 2026 Re: 127 Mitchell Street, LLC (516 Pleasant Valley Way) Our File No. 115.WRZ0154.V01 Planning Review #2 Page 9 s. The applicant has indicated that all lighting will be directed downward and shielded, however the lighting details show a pole mounted fixture that does not appear to be shielded or recessed. The applicant should clarify. t. We defer any comment on grading, drainage, utilities, and stormwater management to the Board Engineer. u. The applicant should address the status of any necessary outside agency approvals. If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to reach out to our office. Sincerely, CME Associates Christopher N. Dochney – PP, AICP Program Manager Board Planner CD cc: Geniece Gary-Adams – Township Zoning Official Zayibeth Carballo, PE, PLS, PP – Township Engineer Kelly Carey, Esq. – Board Attorney John Hess, PE, PP, CME – Board Engineer Ryan MacNeill, PE – Board Engineer 127 Mitchell Street, LLC - Applicant William C. Sullivan Jr., Esq. – Applicant’s Attorney Michael T. Lanzafama, PE – Applicant’s Engineer John McDonough, AICP, PP – Applicant’s Planner
West Orange Zoning Board March 26, 2026 Re: 127 Mitchell Street, LLC (516 Pleasant Valley Way) Our File No. 115.WRZ0154.V01 Planning Review #2 Page 10 7. Materials Submitted The following materials have been submitted and reviewed in association with this application: • A set of Preliminary and Final Site Plan drawings (9 sheets) prepared by Michael T. Lanzafama with Casey & Keller Incorporated of Millburn, New Jersey dated July 17, 2025, revised to February 13, 2026; • A set of signed architectural plans (5 sheets) prepared by Appel Design Group, Inc. of Florham Park, New Jersey, August 14, 2025, revised to January 12, 2026; • A Consulting Report prepared by John McDonough, AICP, PP with John McDonough Associates, dated October 27, 2025; • A completed Application form, cover letter, and checklist September 16, 2025; • Application supplemental submission cover letter, dated October 27, 2025; • Stormwater Management Report prepared by Michael Lanzafama of Casey & Keller Inc, dated August 11, 2025, revised to February 4, 2026; • Stormwater Maintenance Manual, prepared by Michael Lanzafama of Casey & Keller Inc, dated December 20, 2025; • Unsigned Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by Michael Lanzafama of Casey & Keller Inc, dated February 2026; • Twelve (12) page response letter prepared by Michael Lanzafama of Casey & Keller, dated March 2, 2026;
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
7171e83e41b5582,394 bytes