August 16, 2012

that Mr. Steck’s report states there are 13 parking spaces. He asked where they lost the parking space and can they get it back. Mr, Stewart said that they lost the space because they introduced an island in the driveway. He said that 12 parking spaces are sufficient. Mr. Buechler asked Mr. Stewart if all 12 parking spaces are filled, would there still be room for a vehicle to pull in, Mr. Stewart replied yes. Chairman Neuer asked Mr. Stewart if a car could tandem park in front of the dumpster; Mr. Stewart replied yes. Mr. Davis stated that they will have four patients an hour and four workers. He said 12 parking spaces are sufficient. Chairman Neuer observed that with a tandem space available in front of the dumpster, which will be accessed only during non-business hours, there are effectively 13 spaces so that an amendment is not required. Mr. Keller commented on the exterior lights being turned off when office hours are over. He asked if they can have one light in the parking lot remain on 24/7. Dr. Cappiello said that can be done. Mr. Keller stated that there has always been a concern from Director Borg regarding light poles being too high. He asked if they could reduce the height of the 16’ light poles that they are proposing. Mr. Buechler stated that there are no adjoining properties that will be affected from the lights at that height. Mr. Stewart said that they could change it to a 12’ light pole. Chairman Neuer stated that if approval is granted then this will be a condition of such approval. Mr. Freedenfeld addressed item #10 from Omland’s technical review report on page 3 and stated that he will submit updated plans. Mr. Keller asked Mr. Stewart to provide testimony as to why the Board should grant the “C” variances. Mr. Stewart began detailing the positive criteria noting the topography of the land describing it as a narrow lot with steep slopes on the property. He said that this is a beneficial use for this property and noted that the applicant is making aesthetic improvements to this site. Mr. Davis stated that Mr. Steck’s report went into all of the positive and negative criteria. Chairman Neuer asked if there were any members of the public that had any questions for Mr. Stewart. Rosary Morelli approached the podium and stated that she lived at 22 Ralph Road. She asked if she could ask traffic study questions at this time. Chairman

blic that had any questions for Mr. Stewart. Rosary Morelli approached the podium and stated that she lived at 22 Ralph Road. She asked if she could ask traffic study questions at this time. Chairman Neuer stated that she could ask Mr. Stewart what he testified to i.e. the line of site and the moving of the driveway. Ms. Morelli stated that she lives a short distance from the site and asked Mr. Stewart if he felt that cars entering and exiting at that stretch of the road will add another problem to the existing problems of that area. Mr. Stewart stated that he did not give testimony to that. Chairman Neuer stated [10]