Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Minutes · Aug 16, 2012

August 16, 2012

Preserved file SHA-256d051da4f595622fcbdf0ed928102dbc9031ab8b0e186e59f230784536be23909

Indexed text · page 4

Show all pages
Page 4

Chairman Neuer asked if any of the Board members had any comments or changes to this resolution. Seeing none, he asked for a motion to adopt. Mr. Steinhart made a motion to adopt; Mr. Sussman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Buechler: Yes Steinhart: Yes Bullock: - Sussman: Yes Gabry: Yes Weiss: - Quentzel: Yes Zaolino: - Steinhart: Yes Chairman Neuer Yes APPLICATION 4. ZB-12-08/617 Mt. Pleasant Avenue Assoc., LLC Carried from 6/14/12 Block: 170; Lot: 15.05; Zone: R-2 612 Mt. Pleasant Avenue Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval with "D" variances for height and “C” variances to establish a veterinary hospital EXHIBITS A-1 - Elevations sheet E1.01 dated 6/28/12 A-2 — Elevations sheet E1.00 dated 6/28/12 ZB-1 — Resolution dated 8/18/11 for ZB-10-18 A-3 — Site Plan—9 pages dated 7/3/12 Howard Davis, Esq., attorney for the applicant, approached the podium. Chairman Neuer explained that this application has been bifurcated and detailed the bifurcated application process. He stated that on July 14, 2011 the applicant appeared before this Board which approved the Use variance. Chairman Neuer stated that the applicant is appearing before the Board tonight for the rest of the application regarding site plan issues, bulk variances and the location of the new building. Mr. Davis asked the Chairman if the witnesses, who had testified at that meeting, had to testify all over again. Mr. Buechler asked Mr. Davis if there were any changes to anything set in the resolution i.e, number of people who will be working there, deliveries etc. Mr. Davis stated that all of the changes are in regards to the size and height of the building and said that the professionals are here to testify to that. Chairman Neuer questioned why a new application number was assigned because it is the same application which is proceeding in a bifurcated format pursuant to which the original application and testimony are being continued. Mr. Davis stated that the applicant was advised by the Township’s Planning Department to submit a separate application and he also assumed that it was the same application. [4]

File revisions (1)