Minutes · Oct 18, 2012
October 18, 2012
24d04f421132b7e01e7d10bd9321b73b023b5867bf499edf37cb5c91b6d6ed61Indexed text · page 6
Show all pagesMr. Grygiel stated that the Township has adopted a 2010 Master Plan and that the document that Mr. Williams is referring to is not the latest Plan. He said that there are no substantial changes to either plan regarding the Valley corridor. Mr. Williams stated his opinion that the pharmacy will provide a one stop convenience for the patients visiting this site. He said that, if approved, the pharmacy design will focus on the patients visiting this site and they will be able to have their prescriptions filled before they leave the facility. Mr. Bucchler asked Mr. Williams if a stretcher can fit on the lift; Mr. Williams said that the lift is ideally suited just for a wheel chair. Mr, Williams stated that once you enter the building, the physician’s waiting room is on the left and there are lavatories on the right. He said that, if you go beyond the lavatories, there is an entrance to an existing storage area, where the pharmacy will be located, that is approximately 900 sq. feet. Chairman Neuer stated that there is no scale to say how far the pharmacy is from the front door. Mr. Williams said that he is guessing that from the sidewalk to the front door is 95’ and that the pharmacy is 60° from the front door. Mr. Williams detailed the first floor layout. Chairman Neuer asked if the pharmacy will be dispensing narcotics; Mr. Vena said possibly. Chairman Neuer said that he does not see anything in the plans regarding security for the narcotics; Mr. Williams said that if the application is approved they will present those plans, Mr. Williams detailed the positive criteria and stated that this project encourages development and is a convenience to its patrons. Mr. Williams said that if the applicant had proposed a record store, for example, this would not advance the purpose but because the pharmacy is similar to the existing use as a medical office, it will advance the purpose. Mr. Williams stated that the hours of operation for the pharmacy will be the same as the medical building during the week but it will be open on a Saturday by State law. Mr. Williams stated that the applicant is proposing to add more parking for the site and said that there are no other suitable sites for the pharmacy. Mr. Williams detailed the negative criteria. He stated that there will be no substantial detriment to the neighborhood; that the applicant’s primary intent is to
ther suitable sites for the pharmacy. Mr. Williams detailed the negative criteria. He stated that there will be no substantial detriment to the neighborhood; that the applicant’s primary intent is to service the patients onsite; the signage will be minimal; there will be no impact on the Zone because they have already been approved for the bigger project and this one is much smaller and that there will be an additional ten (10) parking spaces onsite to accommodate the original approved use. [6]
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
24d04f421132477,287 bytes