Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Minutes · Nov 29, 2012

November 29, 2012

Preserved file SHA-2568851f0e0e73bd07a7ba67f265b8354dd92a098743cf0034de6fa83c999226fef

Indexed text · page 4

Show all pages
Page 4

20 were submitted to the Board. Mr. Del Vecchio gave a brief description of the changes to the site plan. Chairman Bagoff inquired if Mr. Del Vecchio and Mr. Dwyer had confirmed the architectural acceptability of the Applicant’s architectural firm, Harrison French & Associates. Mr. Dwyer said it was matter of credibility; did the Board give weight to the plans. Mr. Del Vecchio said the testifying architect, Thomas Heigle, AIA, was licensed in New Jersey, and two of the three principals with the firm Harrison French & Associates were licensed in the State of New Jersey. Mr. Eben stated that there were certain procedures required from an architect licensed in the State of New Jersey; the Applicant’s submitted plans did not have the proper title block required in the State of New Jersey; he advised Mr. Del Vecchio to have his client check with the New Jersey State Board of Architects. Chairman Bagoff stated that the Board would accept the Applicant’s architect. Mr. Del Vecchio said that Gregory J. Polyniak, P.E., P.P., Neglia Engineering Associates would be back on record to continue his testimony as professional engineer. Mr. Polyniak testified that the proposed building had been moved south and east to the property, it was not centered as originally planned. The loading area and dumpster area had also been flipped. Mr. Polyniak noted that the changes would now affect the visibility for drivers coming upon the site; however, the revised plan honors the 75 ft. setback. The new design made the small retaining wall much diminished; there would no longer be a need for a wing-wall design. Mr. Polyniak said the revised plan addressed many comments made by the Township professionals and the Board. The revised landscaping plan would exceed Township requirements; the maximum lot the number of parking spaces had been reduced to seventeen (17) from nineteen (19). Mr. Polyniak confirmed that the revised plans were accurate; he stated he had supervised all revisions. Referring to the Omland Engineering memorandum dated November 26, 2012; Mr. Polyniak said that all comments made by Omland had been addressed; either on the plans or during his testimony; including Omland Memo Item #3: Mr. Keller commented on the north driveway. Mr. Polyniak said he ran turing templates and there was not a problem. Omland Memo Item #4: Existing utility services - Mr. Polyniak said there was

Page 4

Item #3: Mr. Keller commented on the north driveway. Mr. Polyniak said he ran turing templates and there was not a problem. Omland Memo Item #4: Existing utility services - Mr. Polyniak said there was no problem with accommodating the recommendation. Item #5: Mr. Polyniak said the width of the parking spaces would be revised to 9 ft., there would be an increase to the buffering space and reduce the impervious coverage. Item #17: Omland Memo noted discrepancy between elevations on site plans and architectural plans; Mr. Polyniak said the architectural plans would be amended to reflect correct elevations, Mr. Eben asked Mr. Polyniak from what direction would tractor trailers be making deliveries; Mr. Polyniak said the track access would probably be from north off of Route 280, traveling south on Pleasant Valley Way. Mr. Eben inquired as to the height of the proposed retaining wall, would it have a railing; and if the proposed Juniper plantings at the base of the retaining wall would be destroyed by snow plowing. Mr. Polyniak said the wall height was 4 % ft., without a railing; additionally it was his opinion that the owner would not want to see a dead area at the base of the wall. Ifplantings were damaged, they would be replaced. Councilwoman McCartney asked if the driveway would be directed one-way. Mr. Del Vecchio answered that the driveway would have two-way traffic. Ms. Carlucci had no questions for Mr. Polyniak. Mr. Weston inquired if the re-located trash area was code compliant; Mr. Polyniak confirmed it was compliant. ‘N:LPLANNING.BRDUWPUMTINOTESI20LA1-29-2012 Specied Meeting Minutes.doc 4

File revisions (1)