November 29, 2012

Ms. Carlucci had no comments, . Mr. Weston said the Applicant had been responsive to the Board; the plan was consistent with land- use law. He said he did have reservations regarding the left turn in to the southern entrance to the site, but overall the plan was acceptable, Mr. Gurland said the Applicant’s team had been amenable. He commented he was not a fan of the architectural design; and voiced concern there was a discrepancy regarding elevations and was wortied there would be a step; but otherwise he said he was very positive regarding the proposed plan. Mr. Klein said he was concerned about the left turn; he said that if there was a problem perhaps it could be monitored and re-addressed at a later date. Mr. Keller voiced concem regarding the legality of requiring a post-construction traffic study; he noted that Pleasant Valley Way was a County road and the County might impose additional restrictions. Mr. Weston questioned if would be safer to have the south driveway be a right-turn in, right-turn out only. Mr. Keller said it was not a simple question; should a restriction be imposed for a condition that occurred only occasionally. The signage should help with enforcement; and installing an island would not deter a motorist from making the left-hand turn, Mr. Keller advised the Board to remember it was a County road and the County might make restrictions. Chairman Bagoff polled the Board regarding restricting left-hand turn. The Board voted not to restrict the left-hand turn. Mr. Dwyer advised the Board that they could make a condition for a traffic study in a year. Conditions: 1. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Township, County, State and Federal laws, ordinances, regulations and directives, including without limitation, obtaining all applicable local, state and federal approvals and/or permits. Without limitation of the foregoing, prior to the signing of the approved site plans, and prior to the commencement of any land disturbance or construction, the Applicant shall submit to this Board, with a copy to the Board Engineer, proof that it has obtained all required governmental approvals. 2. Tfanother governmental entity or agency grants a waiver or variance affecting the plans and/or exhibits submitted by the Applicant, this approval or the conditions attached to it, then the Applicant shall re-apply to this Board respecting

y grants a waiver or variance affecting the plans and/or exhibits submitted by the Applicant, this approval or the conditions attached to it, then the Applicant shall re-apply to this Board respecting the same and this Board shall have the right to view that issue as it relates to this approval and these conditions and modify and amend same, if appropriate. 3. In the event that any other required regulatory approval conflicts with the terms and conditions hereof, or materially alters the same, or the terms and conditions hereof are materially altered by any change in applicable law or regulation other than those municipal regulations for which change is prohibited by the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), or in NSPLANNING BROWPMINUTESI2072 17-29-2012 Special Meeting Mimutes.dac 9