January 10, 2013

SWEARING IN Consulting Engineer, Eric Keller and Consulting Planner for the Township, Paul Grygicl were sworn under oath. APPLICATION 1. ZB-11-14/Longo Carried from 12/20/12 Block: 88; Lot: 21; Zone: OB-2 Seeking “D” and “C” variances for converting a two family house into a three family house. DISCUSSION Carmine Campanile, Esq., attorney for the applicant, approached the podium. He stated that his client came before this Board on 11/15/12 requesting approval to re-convert his property, located at 15 Mt. Pleasant Avenue, into a three family house. Mr. Campanile summarized what happened at that meeting. Mr. Campanile cited reasons that he felt met the positive and negative criteria. He also cited New Jersey legislation stating that there is a shortage of affordable dwellings in the State of New Jersey. Mr. Campanile said that after Hurricane Sandy the need for more affordable dwellings is even greater. He said that, by approving this application, his client will be providing an additional affordable unit. Mr. Campanile stated that this was previously a three family house and was converted into a two family house. He said that his client purchased it as a two family house. Mr. Campanile stated that the Zoning Board does not enforce the law; this Board just enforces the Zoning ordinance. He said that the house will be brought up to code and become much safer for the residents. Mr. Campanile stated that the location is ideal for this type of housing because it is near the Downtown. He also said that it will have a minimal impact on the community. Chairman Neuer asked if any member of the Board had any questions for Mr. Campanile. Mr. Buechler stated that Mr. Longo the applicant, Mr. Salerno the Architect and Mr. Marucci the Engineer testified at the last meeting and asked Mr. Campanile if that was correct; Mr. Campanile said that was correct. Chairman Neuer asked if any members of the public were present for this application; seeing none the Chairman closed that portion of the hearing. Chairman Neuer opened the meeting for discussion by the Board members. Mr. Buechler stated that he is recommending that the Board deny this application. He said that he does not believe that the applicant met the criteria for the “D” variance and that most of the