May 23, 2013

protection would be meaningful. Mr, Steinhart said that the fence is attractive and it will have some affect. He said there has been too much time spent on discussing the adequacy of the fence, Mr. Bullock agreed with Mr. Sussman and he suggested that they may have it reviewed by a security professional. He said that it is aesthetically pleasing and the Board should approve it. Mr. Merklinger said that this type of fencing is used a lot in Government but the gated area would be a concern to Homeland Security. He said that he would approve. Chairman Neuer stated that he had an obligation to ask about the security of the fence and made a motion to approve the one foot C2 variance from a planning perspective and not on the security of the gate. Ms. Gabry seconded the motion to approve the one foot C2 variance. The vote was as follows: Buechler: - Steinhart: Yes Bullock: Yes Sussman: Yes Gabry: Yes Weiss: Yes Merklinger: - Chairman Neuer Yes Quentzel: Yes ADJOURNMENT. The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Neuer at 9:35 pm Adopted: June 20, 2013 Zoning Board Secretary 10