June 5, 2013

Referring to Exhibit A-2, Mr. Petry described the proposed renovations. The existing second story outdoor space would be partially enclosed to accommodate approximately 100 to 120 guests. The existing residential structure would be renovated to create a new reception area; and a new connector area would be erected. The intent was to create separate areas for the a la carte dining and banquet facilities. The renovation was part of continued upgrades to the facility. The miniscule change to impervious coverage would need a “C” variance; he reiterated it was not a significant increase. There would be continuation of the existing pavers; not asphalt; additionally, brick material would be used to coincide with the existing brick material already in place. Mr. Petry opined that the increase in impervious coverage was necessary to improve traffic circulation and create a more direct connection to the a la carte dining area; and create a more comprehensive appearance to the entire structure. Mr. Petry concluded his testimony. Mr, Eben asked how guests would know where to park for the different dining areas; Mr. Petry said directional signage would indicate designated areas. Mr. Eben offered that he had visited the site and noticed an existing brick was damaged and in need of repair; Mr. Petry said any existing damaged spots would be repaired as part of the proposed project. Councilwoman McCartney commented that the Applicant was already using “green” pavers: it was her opinion that the Applicant was proposing a nice plan. There were no questions for Mr. Petry from the Public Advocate or the Public. W. Scott Winger, AIA, WSW Associates, was sworn in, stated his credentials, and was accepted by the Board to be an expert in architecture. After an inquiry made by Mr. Eben, Mr. Winger confirmed he was a New Jersey licensed architect with a Certificate of Authorization as required by the State of New Jersey. Mr. Winger said he had worked with the Manor project for over a year, referring to Exhibit A-8, he described the projects elevations and the proposed building materials. He indicated that the overall architectural style of the facility was colonial; the interior was wood paneled; the renovations would be a continuation of the characteristics of the existing building. He said that as suggested by the Technical Review Committee; the warmness of brick would be

r was wood paneled; the renovations would be a continuation of the characteristics of the existing building. He said that as suggested by the Technical Review Committee; the warmness of brick would be brought to the second level. Mr. Winger highlighted the existing materials and the described how the proposed materials would similar to create a cohesive esthetic. The exterior would have a balanced front; the roof-top terrace would include a brick base; stucco would be continued; there would be a metal roof of an aged copper appeal; and brick-face facade with smail metal overhang taking a cue from the existing trellis feature. The renovations while enlarging the structure, would be in scale with the existing facility. Mr. Winger concluded his testimony. Referring to Exhibit A-8, Councilwoman McCartney opined that on the left side of structure, one more line of bricks was still needed to balance the fagade. Mr. Winger said he— on left side you still need one more line of bricks. Mr. Winger said he appreciated the comment; he was currently studying the plan to see if more brick could be brought in to the structure. Mr. Weston asked Mr. Winger to describe the type of stucco to be used; Mr. Winger said it would be synthetic. Mr. Weston said he was concerned about possible mildew. There were no questions for Mr. Winger from the Public Advocate or the Public. PB Minutes June 5, 2013