October 17, 2013

Mr. Maltz presented the Site Dimension Plan for the project. Mr. Neuer asked to have drawing #3 of the Site Dimension Plan with the revision date of 6/11/13 marked as Exhibit A-8 for identification, Mr. Vena stated that Mr. Maltz will be testifying to the queuing. Mr. Maltz referred to the site dimension plan and detailed what he observed on September 12, 2013 and October 2, 2013 regarding the stacking of the vehicles. He said that it was basically a “drop and go” in the morning and all of the cars were stacked onsite; no vehicles spilled out on to Gregory Avenue. Mr. Vena then asked Mr. Maltz to describe the queuing during the afternoon pickup. Mr. Maltz referred to Exhibit A-8 and noted that it has been changed from a single queue to a double queue. He said that during his afternoon observations, the double lane stacking of vehicles did not extend out onto Gregory Avenue. Mr. Neuer asked Mr. Maltz how many feet were Jeft before a vehicle reached Gregory Avenue; Mr. Maltz said approximately 65 to 70 feet. Mr. Maltz, stated that the prior plan proposed 42 vehicles queued onsite and two (2) vehicles overflowed on to Gregory Avenue. He said this plan is proposing 49 vehicles being queued. onsite with no overflow on to Gregory Avenue. Mr. Neuer asked Mr. Maltz if the 2011 plan proposed a single or double lane; Mr. Maltz replied single lane. Mr. Maltz detailed the stacking lanes and said that there will be an attendant present who controls the stacking of the vehicles. Mr. Neuer asked Mr. Maltz how many attendants control the stacking; he replied one. Mr. Neuer asked what time the attendant is there and for how long; Mr. Maltz said the attendant is there for approximately a half hour between 3 and 3:30 pm, Mr. Maltz stated that the new stacking plan eliminates the need to widen Gregory Avenue. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Maltz if he responded to the comments from Omland Engineering in their memo dated 6/6/13; Mr. Maltz replied yes. Mr, Neuer asked Mr. Russo if he had any other comments; Mr. Russo replied no. He said all of the comments were addressed. Mr. Neuer asked Mr. Maltz if the plan provided safe ingress and egress to the site; Mr. Maltz replied yes.