Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Minutes · Nov 10, 2011

November 10, 2011

Preserved file SHA-256b85e70335b2b90e9d30fa4228395e5ce441c5a34963dd64398539e6805b1f098

Indexed text · page 2

Show all pages
Page 2

APPLICATION 1. 7B-11-10/Golda Och Academy, a Solomon Schechter School Block: 79 Lot: 21 Zone: R-4 122 Gregory Avenue Proposed building addition, redesigned parking and traffic patterns with two (2) “In” variances and one (1) “C” variance EXHIBITS A-1 Site Plans (9 sheets) dated 4/27/11 with revisions A-2 Colored Rendering (Drawing 3) A-3 Architectural Rendering A-4 Preliminary Exterior Elevations Sheet P-4 7/11/11 A-5 Sign Detail (Northfield & Gregory Avenue) A-8 Peter G. Steck Report dated 4/29/11 Pre-marked A-6 Lighting Package (3 sheets) — identification purposes only A-7 Signage Package (3 sheets) DISCUSSION Joseph Vena, Esq., attorney for the applicant, approached the podium and brought the Board up to date regarding who gave testimony at the 10/24/11 meeting and who would be testifying at this meeting. Mr. Vena also stated that the applicant’s traffic engineer, Harold Maltz, will testify with the traffic testimony at the Zoning Board’s regular meeting on [1/17/11. Mr. Vena asked the Board to set any conditions they may have at tonight’s meeting while he has the experts present. Chairman Neuer stated that the Board will discuss conditions at the conclusion of this matter if an approval is to be granted. Mr. Vena called Anthony Guzzo, architect for the applicant, who was sworn in at the 10/24/11 meeting. Chairman Neuer recognized him as an expert in his field of architecture. Mr. Guzzo presented a lighting package to the Board. Chairman Neuer asked if this was part of the lighting plan that was in the submission package. Mr. Guzzo replied no. Chairman Neuer stated that Ms. Borg and Mr. Keller must review it before it is allowed as an exhibit so he will allow them to be marked for identification only and they will not be admitted into evidence until after the Board professionals have ample opportunity to inspect and comment. The Chairman stated that this information is supposed to be part of the submission package and Mr. Guzzo did not have enough copies for the board to review tonight. Mr. Vena stated that there is no change to the lighting plan. He explained that Ms. Borg had a question at the last meeting, regarding the height of the fixture on the plans, so they are presenting a different fixture, Chairman Neuer stated that this plan must be reviewed by the Board’s experts and next week the Board will consider whether to approve it.

File revisions (1)