Minutes · Oct 1, 2014
October 1, 2014
982a34a8f43a3293fde528151d4c5dfa8e44cefaff65afc407503194192490f2Indexed text · page 2
Show all pagesRESOLUTIONS PB-14-15T/Spring Reflexology Spa, Inc. Block: 154; Lot: 14; Zone: B-2 640-642 Eagle Rock Avenue Technical Review Application. DISCUSSION Mr. Grygiel gave a brief recapitulation of the Technical Review Application for retrofitting an existing retail space to operate a foot-reflexology massage establishment; he said it was a straightforward Application approved without additional conditions by the Technical Review Committee at the September 18, 2014 meeting. Vice Chairman Weston said the building plans did not work; they were not building code compliant; he said he could not endorse the Application; he requested the approval be amended to include conditions that the Applicant submit revised plans to conform with Building Code requirements. Mr. Eben said the architect did not state the occupancy; he said it appeared that the occupancy was approximately 32 people at any one time; if there were more than 25 people, two toilet rooms were required; the parking was insufficient. Mr. Grygiel said representatives from the Health Department and the Building Department were at the Technical Review meeting and had raised issues with the plans; the business would have to pass required inspections before it could open. The Board amended the Resolution for approval with additional conditions: 1. Applicant to submit to the Construction Official revised architectural plans to Building Department; 2, Applicant to conform to all applicable building codes and safety codes. The Board voted on the Resolution as follows: Motion: Chairman Heller Second: Dr. Bagoff Bagoff: Yes Carlucci: Yes Eben: No Ghebremicael: Yes Gurland: Absent | Klein: Yes Lester: Absent | McCartney: Yes Weston: Yes Wilkes: Absent | Heller: Yes PB-14-16T/Garden Academy, Inc. Block: 172.23; Lot: 33; Zone: R-4 627 Mt. Pleasant Avenue Technical Review Application. DISCUSSION Mr. Grygiel gave a brief recapitulation of the Technical Review Application for a school for special needs students to be located in a vacant property that was previously a preschool/daycare. The school taught autistic students, the program was labor intense with a 1-1 student/teacher ratio. In response to questions from the Board, Mr. Grygiel said the age of the students were 2 % through high school; the school was properly licensed by the State, it was currently operating in leased space in Maplewood; it had purchased
e Board, Mr. Grygiel said the age of the students were 2 % through high school; the school was properly licensed by the State, it was currently operating in leased space in Maplewood; it had purchased the West Orange property to accommodate a growing student population. Mr. Grygiel was unsure if the building was sprinklered. The Application was for
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
982a34a8f43a366,401 bytes