Minutes · Dec 18, 2014
December 18, 2014
e6c8d043d823e61c76ee42cd1ca8634d7c1cccf7c27e52ea32a789bcaa247d67Indexed text · page 12
Show all pagesTtem #1 regarding the boundary and topographic surveys being attached to the site plans for any future submissions ~ applicant will comply. litem #2 regarding the plans depicting a four foot wide walkway — applicant will comply. Item #3 regarding extending the sidewalk along the easterly side of the new parking spaces — Mr. Adelsohn stated that in order to do that they would have to remove a tree; Mr. Keller said he is satisfied with them not extending the sidewalk for said reason. Ttem #4 regarding confirming that there is an accessible route from the ADA parking stall to the nearest building entrance — Mr. Adelsohn stated that the building is not ADA accessible so therefore changing it to accommodate a wheelchair is not feasible. Ttem #5 regarding not using flush curbing around the passenger loading zone and re- grading the proposed parking area — applicant will comply. litem #6 regarding providing additional top and bottom wall grades — applicant will comply. Mr. Neuer asked Mr. Grygiel if item #6 requires a variance; he replied he is not sure. Mr. Grygiel said that he thinks that it only requires a building permit. He said that he would check the Township’s Ordinance Item #7 regarding complying with the Township Ordinance for providing one shade tree plus ground level plantings for every ten (10) parking spaces — applicant will comply. Ttem #8 regarding clarification about the lights being on a timer or left on from dusk to dawn — Mr. Adelsohn stated that the lights will be left on from dusk to dawn. Item #9 regarding the hydraulic analysis of the existing outlet pipe. Mr. Keller stated that he has not received any calculations yet and advised Mr. Adelsohn to get them to him so that he can review them. Item #10 regarding the use of more traditional residential access drive materials — Mr. Adelsohn said that they will comply with changing the surface course but they will leave the base course pavement, Mr. Keller said that was acceptable. item #11 regarding the soil erosion and sediment control plan publishing the proposed area of disturbance — the applicant will comply. Item #12 regarding the inlet detail specifying which type of Eco curb piece is being provided — the applicant will comply. Tiem #13 regarding providing an above and below ground “as-built” of the constructed improvements -- the applicant will comply. Item #14 regarding
iece is being provided — the applicant will comply. Tiem #13 regarding providing an above and below ground “as-built” of the constructed improvements -- the applicant will comply. Item #14 regarding submitting and engineer’s estimate of probable construction costs — the applicant will comply. Item #15 regarding approvals from the Hudson Essex Passaic Soil Conservation District and the Essex County Planning Board — the applicant will comply. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Keller if he had any other comments; he replied no. There were no further questions for Mr. Adelsohn from the Board Members or the Board Professionals. 12
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
e6c8d043d823495,263 bytes