February 19, 2015

Ms. Gabry asked Mr. Cackovic if the meditation room and the Temple will be used at the same time; he said he did not know. Ms. Weiss referred to the foyer area being proposed in the Temple and asked Mr. Cackovic if the foyer is only for ingress and egress; he replied yes. Mr. Keller asked Mr. Cackovic if the foot print for the proposed meditation room is larger; he replied yes. Mr. Cackovic said that the foot print of the building is growing over 600 sq. feet. Mr. Keller asked Mr. Cackovic if the altar and the passage way are included in the square footage of the Temple; he said that the square footage does not include the passage way but it does include the altar. Mr. Keller asked Mr. Cackovic how many square feet the prayer hall would be minus the altar; he replied approximately 370 sq. feet total. Mr. Keller asked Mr, Cackovic what the lower level of the Temple will be used for; he said that is a storage area. Mr. Cackovic said that the lower level area will be unfinished and have concrete walls. Mr. Williams stated that if the Board has a concern about this space being finished for a use in the future that they can condition that the area remains as is. Mr. Keller asked Mr. Cackovic if there is a gutter system; he replied yes. Mr. Grygiel asked Mr. Cackovic to explain the large vestibule area in the rear of the Temple; he said that the applicant eliminated the residence and that it was originally a breezeway. Ms. Weiss asked Mr. Cackovic why they just didn’t eliminate the vestibule; he said that the priests utilize the vestibule for changing into their robes. Ms. Weiss asked Mr. Cackovic why they need an elevator; Mr. Keller said that they need the elevator because it is required by code as vertical transport between the two floors. Mr. Keller asked Mr. Cackovic why they are keeping the rear vestibule if they are demolishing the existing building. He said that if they shrunk the size of the vestibule it would reduce the size of the rear variance. Mr. Cackovic said that he will ask the applicant if they will consider reducing the size of the vestibule. Ms. Gabry called for a recess at 9:40 pm. Ms. Gabry resumed the meeting at 9:54 pm. There were no further questions for Mr. Cackovic from the Board Members or the Board Professionals. 10

Ms. Gabry asked if any members of the public had any questions for Mr. Cacvkovic. Thomas J. Trautner, Jr. Esq. approached the podium. Mr. Trautner stated that he is from the law firm Wolf and Samson and represents Tal Benzvi and Travis McManigal, who reside at 5 Allsop Court, as objectors for this application. Mr. Trautner referred to Exhibit A-8 and asked Mr. Cackovic what the purpose of the dividing wall was; he said that the detachable wall divides the prayer hall and the dining room. Mr. Cackovic said that at the end of service they can open it and go in and dine. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the tables and chairs in the dining room can be removed; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the congregation can sit on the floor in the dining room; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if they can add more tables in the dining room besides the nine (9) tables being proposed; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner referred to Exhibit A-8 and asked Mr. Cackovic if they could put tables and chairs in the entry area in the future if they decided to; he said that it is his opinion that they would have no need to do that. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if there is a delivery function in the vestibule space; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic what type of deliveries would be delivered in that space; he said food deliveries in preparation for an event. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the Temple would be a Sai Baba Temple; he said that it would be a Hindu Temple. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if there would be a need for an overflow space specifically for the Temple; he said he did not discuss any overflow space. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the priest could disrobe anywhere else other than the vestibule; he said the disrobing could possibly take place somewhere else. 11

Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if there is any reason why the elevator cannot be located in a different structure; he said that it could be considered. Mr. Cackovic said the applicant will make that decision. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic how many bedrooms are being proposed in the caretaker’s home; he replied three (3) bedrooms. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic why there are multiple bedrooms; he said because the house has three bedrooms. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the bedrooms in the caretaker’s home will be used as guest quarters; he said not to his knowledge. Mr. Trautner referred to Exhibit A-11 and asked Mr. Cackovic if the glass on the Temple will have any reflective quality; he said not really. Mr. Cackovic said that any glass will have some reflective quality. Michal Kasher approached the podium and stated that she lives at 11 Barton Drive. Ms. Kasher asked Mr. Cackovic why the guest quarters is still on the application if it has been eliminated; he said he does not know what is on the application. Ms. Kasher said that the guest quarters and the garages are still on the current notice that was sent to the residents within 200’ of the property. Ms. Beirne said that the notice is still legally valid. Vincent Vitiello approached the podium and stated that he lives at 6 Barton Drive. Mr. Vitiello referred to Exhibit A-8 and asked Mr. Cackovic to detail the floor plans again; he complied. Mr. Vitiello asked Mr. Cackovic why they are expanding the footprint of the existing residence; he said they are proposing a two (2) car garage and a storage room in the caretaker’s residence. Katarzyna Adamezya approached the podium and stated that she lives at 8 Allsop Court. Ms. Adamezya asked Mr. Cackovic if there is a reason why deliveries have to be made in the rear of the property; he said that the front of the property could also be used for deliveries. 12

Ms. Adamezya asked Mr. Cackovic how much noise the elevator will create; he said elevators are very quiet and that it is in an enclosed structure. Mr. Williams stated that this concludes testimony for tonight. Ms. Gabry stated for the record that this application will be carried over to the regular Zoning Board meeting held on March 19, 2015 and that no further notice will be necessary. The meeting was adjourned by Ms. Gabry at 10:23 pm. ger Adopted: March 19, 2015 / “Yh 2 yA a {fe [Za e Cc —7L Qe) / 3 a Rose DeSena : Zoning Board Secretary 13