February 19, 2015

Ms. Gabry asked if any members of the public had any questions for Mr. Cacvkovic. Thomas J. Trautner, Jr. Esq. approached the podium. Mr. Trautner stated that he is from the law firm Wolf and Samson and represents Tal Benzvi and Travis McManigal, who reside at 5 Allsop Court, as objectors for this application. Mr. Trautner referred to Exhibit A-8 and asked Mr. Cackovic what the purpose of the dividing wall was; he said that the detachable wall divides the prayer hall and the dining room. Mr. Cackovic said that at the end of service they can open it and go in and dine. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the tables and chairs in the dining room can be removed; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the congregation can sit on the floor in the dining room; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if they can add more tables in the dining room besides the nine (9) tables being proposed; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner referred to Exhibit A-8 and asked Mr. Cackovic if they could put tables and chairs in the entry area in the future if they decided to; he said that it is his opinion that they would have no need to do that. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if there is a delivery function in the vestibule space; he replied yes. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic what type of deliveries would be delivered in that space; he said food deliveries in preparation for an event. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the Temple would be a Sai Baba Temple; he said that it would be a Hindu Temple. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if there would be a need for an overflow space specifically for the Temple; he said he did not discuss any overflow space. Mr. Trautner asked Mr. Cackovic if the priest could disrobe anywhere else other than the vestibule; he said the disrobing could possibly take place somewhere else. 11