February 19, 2015

Mr. DiLorenzo continued with his testimony detailing the pergola that is being installed and the design of the swimming pool. He said that the hardship is due to the impervious coverage on the property prior to the applicants purchasing the property. Mr. DiLorenzo said that the pavers were also there when they purchased the property. There were no further questions for Mr. DiLorenzo from the Board Members or the Board Professionals. There were no members of the public that had any questions for Mr. DiLorenzo. Vice Chairman Neuer asked Mr. and Mrs. Carter if they received any comments from their neighbors; Mrs. Carter replied no. Mrs. Carter said that they have active teenagers who want to be able to have their friends in their home. She said that she appreciates the Board’s consideration. There were no further questions for Mr. and Mrs. Carter from the Board Members or the Board Professionals. There were no members of the public that had any questions for Mr. or Mrs. Carter. Vice Chairman Neuer closed the hearing. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that he sees nothing negative with the application and that the Engineers testimony was compelling. He said that the applicants should not be penalized by the impervious coverage because they inherited some of the impervious conditions. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that the pavers are not one hundred percent impervious, the benefits outweigh the detriments and the setbacks are de minimis. Vice Chairman Neuer made a motion to approve the application Ms. Gabry seconded the motion to approve the application. The vote was as follows: Bullock: Yes Steinhart: - Gabry: Yes Sussman: Yes Neuer: Yes Weiss: Yes Quentzel: Yes Chairman Buechler: -