April 16, 2015

Mr. Santos referred to Exhibit A-5 and detailed he plan. He said that the site is not a major development and they are not required to provide any water quality or recharge reports. Mr. Santos presented sheet SP5 of the Lighting and Landscape Plan dated 2/26/15, Vice Chairman Neuer stated that sheet SP5 of the Lighting and Landscape Plan dated 2/26/15 was pre-marked as Exhibit A-6 for identification. Mr. Santos referred to Exhibit A-6 and detailed the lighting that is being proposed for the new parking area. He also detailed what landscaping is being proposed stating that they will remove seven (7) trees and add three (3) red maple trees. Mr. Williams presented a memo from the Township Forester. He said that the memo from Mr. Linson stated that he has no objection to this application. Vice Chairman Neuer asked to have the memo dated 4/16/15 from John Linson, the Township’s Forester, marked as Exhibit A-9 for identification. Mr. Santos stated that they will address the following comments in the letter from Omland Engineering that is dated 4/3/15: ¢ Item #1 — lots were consolidated. « Item #2 — applicant will comply. ¢ Item #3 — applicant provided memo from Township Forester confirming approval of tree removal, © Item #4 — the applicant stated that the parking lot is not big enough to plant the number of trees required by the Township’s ordinance. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that this comment from Omland Engineering constitutes a variance and that Mr. Williams can. amend the application to include this variance. Mr. Williams stated that the trees are not there now. Ms. Weiss asked Mr. Russo if he thought they should leave the parking lot as it is now without trees, he said that the Township Ordinance stipulates that they need a certain number of trees for a certain number of parking spaces. Mr. Russo asked the Board Members how they felt about bringing the parking lot up to Ordinance or leaving it as is. Vice Chairman Neuer stated the Planner can testify if it would be impractical to plant trees in the parking lot because of its size. Ttem #5 — applicant will comply. Ttem #6 — Mr. Santos affirmed that the pavement grades within the proposed ADA. compliant parking stalls meet the appropriate grades and cross slopes. ¢ Item #7 — Mr. Santos identified the accessible route and entrance of the ADA compliant stall on lot 18. Mr. Schwarzbaum asked Mr. Santos

parking stalls meet the appropriate grades and cross slopes. ¢ Item #7 — Mr. Santos identified the accessible route and entrance of the ADA compliant stall on lot 18. Mr. Schwarzbaum asked Mr. Santos if the handicap parking spot on the lower level is accessible to the fields; he replied yes. Mr. Bullock asked Mr. Russo if it was common to require 8” of asphalt for paving the driveway; he said that it is not uncommon, Mr. Russo said that raising the parking lot is the better option. ¢ Item #8 — Mr. Santos stated that there is adequate lighting in the parking lot and that they are not changing anything on the site; he said they are just adding parking spaces. Mr. Santos said that the lighting plan calls for additional light fixtures, Vice Chairman Neuer