Minutes · Jan 7, 2015
January 7, 2015
8dcc1c03e7366be6c3abe915349f7bfb4b5abd88428dd098280c18ab41a3a497Indexed text · page 4
Show all pagesThe Board voted on the Resolution as follows: Motion: Chairman Heller Second: Dr. Bagoff Bagoff: Yes Carlucci: Absent | Eben: Yes Ghebremicael: Absent Gurland: Yes Klein: - Lester: Absent | McCartney: Yes Weston: Absent | Wilkes: Absent | Heller: PB-14-27H/Katherine Garrison Block: 172.19; Lot: 2; Zone: R-4 15 Ralph Road Home Occupation Childcare. DISCUSSION Mr. Grygiel gave the Board a recapitulation of the Application for a Home Occupation Childcare Business for up to five (5) children that had been approved by the Technical Review Subcommittee on December 18, 2014 with the following conditions: 1. Applicant must obtain a Certificate of Continued Occupancy. 2. Applicant agrees to abide by the rules of the West Orange Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 25-9.9 in all home occupation activities as applied. In response to inquiry from Mr. Eben, Mr. Grygiel confirmed the Applicant stated there would be no more than five children on premises during the hours of operation. The Board voted on the Resolution as follows: Motion: Chairman Heller Second: Dr. Bagoff Bagoff: Yes Carlucci: Absent | Eben: Yes Ghebremicael: Absent Gurland: Yes Klein: - Lester: Absent | McCartney: Yes Weston: Absent | Wilkes: Absent | Heller: Yes PB-13-25/Falcon Associates for South Mountain Realty Associates, LLC Block: 168; Lot: 27.02; Zone: B-2 563 Northfield Avenue Amended Site Plan with variances. DISCUSSION Mr. Grygiel explained the original Resolution adopted by the Board {April 2, 2014) contained testimony stating the existing building would be “partially demolished “. The Building Department denied permits to the Applicant's contractor because the submitted plans did not match the original Resolution. At the December 18, 2014 Technical Review Meeting, the Applicant appeared before the Committee and stated it would be better to demolish the entire structure rather than partially demolish the existing structure as originally proposed and approved. The Technical Committee agreed that the proposed changes to the plans were not substantial and the result would remain essentially unchanged. There were no changes to the variances. The Committee
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
8dcc1c03e736414,539 bytes