Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Minutes · Apr 1, 2015

April 1, 2015

Preserved file SHA-256aa3992a1e14495b7fd17e449fa92b467bddd53bcb3c47b5387298fccae931ed5

Indexed text · page 9

Show all pages
Page 9

25-12.1h.2 Minimum parking aisle width 13 ft. NA 10.4 ft. 25-12.1h.6 Minimum driveway width 14 ft. NA 10.4 ft. 25-12.1i Minimum distance of parking 50 ft. 23 ft. 23 ft. area entrance or exit from residential district 25-12.1p Minimum number of trees in 1 for each 10 NA 0 parking area parking stalls They were all “c” type bulk variances that could be justified under “c(1)” - the physical hardships associated with the property, or “c(2)” criteria - the benefits of adaptive reuse of the building and positive reinvestment in the downtown outweighed the detriments associated with the existing developed site. He opined it was a good Application that met all statutory criteria; it created no substantial impairment to the intent of the Redevelopment Plan, or substantial detriment to the surrounding properties. Mr. Grygiel asked if the number of parking spaces were reduced due to redesign, would the proofs provided by Mr. McDonough still apply; Mr. McDonough answered in the affirmative. In response to questions from Mr. Russo, Mr. McDonough confirmed the standards for minimum required parking isle width - 11 ft. for 30 degrees parking, and 13 ft. for 45 degrees parking. Mr. McDonough was unsure of the exact angle of degree of the southerly parking spaces; he understood Mr. Staigar’s testimony had indicated 45 degrees. Considering the lighting plan, he opined the parking lot levels were adequate; it met the standards for minimum foot candle requirements with a parking space. He said he liked the idea of dark spots along the perimeter of the property near residential area. Mr. Russo opined the plan did not appear code compliant; Vice Chairman Weston suggested lighting plan approval by the Township Engineer as a condition of Approval. Kevin Kruse, Downtown West Orange Alliance, asked for clarification regarding parking alternatives; Mr. McDonough said there was on-street parking on Shepard Terrace, Main Street, possible use of the parking lot across Main Street, and a municipal parking lot. Mr. Gurland asked if there was a Township ordinance concerning Shepard Terrace parking within 25 or 50 ft. of Main Street; Mr. McDonough said there was a “No Parking Here to Corner” sign on Shepard Terrace; it would be illegal to park within 25 ft. of Main Street. There was no further testimony. Chairman Heller opened the floor to Public Comment. Kevin Kruse, Downtown West

Page 9

ner” sign on Shepard Terrace; it would be illegal to park within 25 ft. of Main Street. There was no further testimony. Chairman Heller opened the floor to Public Comment. Kevin Kruse, Downtown West Orange Alliance, was sworn in; he requested the Board adapt its thinking; the Downtown preferred lots of open space and a clear view to retail facades, not trees and landscaping. He stated he was shocked the Board would suggest less parking; he opined on-site parking was crucial for retail space. He stated he spoke for the DWOA; the DWOA wanted on-site parking. He suggested the DWOA speak to the Board at an upcoming meeting so that everyone could be “in sync.”

File revisions (1)