Minutes · Aug 20, 2015
August 20, 2015
c7ae1b22733021051c941cb55dbbf19a59612bc20ff6a4de43dba0f08494963dIndexed text
MINUTES TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING August 20, 2015 The West Orange Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on August 20, 2015 commencing 8:00 PM at 66 Main Street, West Orange, N.J. in Council Chambers. Chairman Buechler called the meeting to order at approximately 8:00 P.M. It was announced that notification of this meeting was given to the Township Clerk, the West Orange Chronicle, and posted on the Township Bulletin Board on December 11, 2014 in accordance with the “Open Public Meetings Act.” Chairman Buechler asked everyone to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Alice Beirne, Esq., Board Attorney, read the Opening Statement. PRESENT: Bruce Buechler, Greg Bullock, Diane Nash, Philip D. Neuer, Bart Quentzel, Irv Schwarzbaum, Mark Sussman, Alice Weiss ABSENT: D. Gabry (excused) W. Steinhart (excused) ALSO PRESENT: Paul Grygiel, Consulting Planner Frank Russo, Consulting Engineer Alice Beirne, Esq., Board Attorney Rose DeSena, Board Secretary H. Grossman, Esq., Public Advocate D. Dillon, Audio-Digital Transcription Service ANNOUNCEMENTS Future Meetings: September 17, 2015 (regular meeting) — 8:00 pm October 15, 2015 (regular meeting) — 8:00 pm November 19, 2015 (regular meeting) — 8:00 pm Chairman Buechler announced that application ZB14-08/Sai Hira Ram Trust, Inc. that was scheduled to be heard at this meeting has requested to be carried over to the next regular Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting held on September 17, 2015. He said that no further notice will be required.
MINUTES Adopt Minutes: July 16, 2015 (regular meeting) Chairman Buechler asked the Board Members if they had any additional comments to the July 16, 2015 regular meeting that were submitted to them for review. Seeing none, he asked for a motion to approve said minutes. Mr. Sussman made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 16, 2015 regular Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting as submitted to the Board members; Vice Chairman Neuer seconded the motion and all were in favor. Mr. Bullock was not present at the July 16, 2015 meeting and did not vote on these minutes. SWEARING IN Consulting Planner for the Township, Paul Grygiel, and Consulting Engineer for the Township, Frank Russo were sworn under oath. RESOLUTIONS 1. ZB-15-06/Fell & Burton Approved 7/16/15 Block: 161.06; Lot: 34; Zone: R-4 15 Spring Hill Drive “C” variance for a rear yard setback for an addition to the rear of the home Chairman Buechler stated that comments were submitted by Vice Chairman Neuer and himself and Ms. Beirne approved those comments and incorporated them into the resolution. Chairman Buechler asked if any other Board Member had any comments; seeing none Chairman Buechler made a motion to approve the resolution with said revisions. Mr. Quentzel seconded the motion to adopt. The vote was as follows: Bullock: - Schwarzbaum: Yes Gabry: - Steinhart: - D. Nash: - Sussman: Yes Neuer: Yes Weiss: Yes Quentzel: Yes Chairman Buechler: Yes
2. ZB-15-07/Wakeman Approved 7/16/15 Block: 164.02; Lot: 36; Zone: R-4 56 Oak Crest Road “C” variance for widening an existing driveway Chairman Buechler stated that comments were submitted by Vice Chairman Neuer and Ms. Beirne approved those comments and incorporated them into the resolution. Chairman Buechler asked if any other Board Member had any comments; seeing none Chairman Buechler asked for a motion to adopt the resolution. Vice Chairman Neuer made a motion to adopt the resolution with said revisions; Mr. Schwarzbaum seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Bullock: - Schwarzbaum: Yes Gabry: - Steinhart: - D. Nash: Yes Sussman: Yes Neuer: Yes Weiss: Yes Quentzel: Yes Chairman Buechler: - 3. ZB-15-09/Gurunathan Approved 7/16/15 8 Knollwood Drive Block: 161.06; Lot: 23; Zone: R-4 “C” variance to construct an enclosed patio AKA a sunroom in the rear of the House. Chairman Buechler stated that comments were submitted by Vice Chairman Neuer and Ms. Beirne approved those comments and incorporated them into the resolution. Chairman Buechler asked if any other Board Member had any comments; seeing none Chairman Buechler asked for a motion to adopt the resolution. Vice Chairman Neuer made a motion to adopt the resolution with said revisions; Mr. Sussman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Bullock: - Schwarzbaum: Yes Gabry: - Steinhart: - D. Nash: Yes Sussman: Yes Neuer: Yes Weiss: Yes Quentzel: Yes Chairman Buechler: -
APPLICATION(S) 1. ZB-15-08/Petrocelli Carried from 7/16/15 21 Bloomfield Way Block: 102; Lot: 21; Zone: R-1 “C” variance for constructing a 24’ high accessory building EXHIBITS A-1 — Title Sheet dated 3/24/15 Sheet T-1 A-2 — Sheet SP-1 dated 7/24/15 A-3 — Sheet A-1 dated 3/24/15 Garage & Attic Floor Plans A-4 — Sheet A-2 dated 3/24/15 Building Elevations & Notes A-5 — Site Photos, Sheet G-1 dated 7/24/15 — Photo P-1 admitted only A-6 — Aerial Photo Exhibit dated 7/14/15 A-7 — Photo Board — seven photos A,B,C,D,E,F,G A-8 — New Location of Proposed Garage Plan dated 7/23/15 Joseph Vena, Esq., attorney for the applicant, approached the podium and was sworn under oath. Vice Chairman Neuer addressed Ms. Beirne and stated that he knows the applicant, Mr. Petrocelli. He said that his company is working on a property where he is Counsel and they have had interactions and asked if he would be disqualified from hearing this application; Ms. Beirne replied no. The applicant raised no objection. Mr. Vena called the applicant as his first witness. Dennis Petrocelli approached the podium and was sworn under oath. He stated that he has resided at this house since 1998 and in 2001 they did a major renovation restoring the home’s Victorian elements. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli if there was a garage on the property when he purchased the house; he replied no. Mr. Petrocellis stated that there was a shed but not a garage. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli if there is a concrete pad there now; he replied yes. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli why he would like to build a garage; he said that his wife wanted the garage because their cars are outside all of the time. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli if the proposed garage will have a second level; he replied yes. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli why he is proposing a second level in the garage; he said it will be a loft space used for storage.
Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli if there will be any plumbing fixtures in the garage; he replied no. Mr. Petrocelli said there will only be a hose in the garage. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli if there will be electric in the garage; he stated that the only electric in the garage will be outlets and a charger for their electric car. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Petrocelli if he had any discussion with his neighbors about constructing the garage; he replied yes. Mr. Petrocelli said that his neighbor asked him to move the garage over a little from where he originally wanted to build it and he agreed to do that. He said that is the only change that was made. Mr. Vena stated that the amended plans, showing the change, were submitted to the Board Secretary. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Petrocelli if any plumbing beyond the hose is being proposed in the garage; he replied no. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Petrocelli if there will be air conditioning or heat in the garage; he replied no. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Petrocelli if the variance is only a height issue; he replied yes. Mr. Quentzel asked Mr. Petrocelli if they will be putting an electric heater in the garage during the winter; he replied no. Mr. Sussman asked Mr. Petrocelli if he owned the company Matrix; he said Matrix is his wife’s company. There were no further questions for Mr. Petrocelli from the Board Members of the Board Professionals. Chairman Buechler asked if any members of the public had any questions for Mr. Petrocelli. Marisa Goetz approached the podium and stated that she lives at 89 Glen Avenue. Ms. Goetz stated that she has a comment regarding the location of the garage; Chairman Buechler advised Ms. Goetz that she can make a comment at the end of the witness’s testimony. Mr. Vena called the Architect as his next witness. Robert Scialla approached the podium and was sworn under oath. Mr. Scialla detailed his professional and educational background as a licensed architect in the State of New Jersey. Chairman Bucchler asked Mr. Scialla who he was employed by; he replied Justin Mihalik. Mr. Scialla said that Mr. Mihalik signed the plans and he worked on this project with him.
Chairman Buechler accepted Mr. Scialla as an expert in architecture. Mr. Scialla presented sheet SP-1 of the plot plan showing the proposed garage. Chairman Buechler stated that sheet SP-1 with a revision date of 7/24/15 was pre-marked as Exhibit A-2 for identification. Mr. Scialla referred to Exhibit A-2 and detailed where they are proposing to construct the garage. Chairman Buchler asked Mr. Scialla if the impervious coverage will increase or decrease; he said that the impervious coverage will slightly increase but it still complies with the Township Ordinance. Mr. Sussman asked Mr. Scialla to refer to Exhibit A-2 and detail the existing driveway; he complied noting that it is a gravel driveway. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Scialla if the gravel was pervious or impervious; he replied pervious. Chairman Buechler referred to the site plan and asked Mr. Scialla to explain what the wood garden was; he said that area is a tomato garden with rail road ties around it. Mr. Scialla presented photos of the site. Chairman Buechler stated that sheet G-1 of photos of the site was pre-marked as Exhibit A-5 for identification. Mr. Scialla stated that Exhibit A-5 is just testimony, he said it was not part of the submission. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Scialla if the photos in Exhibit A-5 accurately depict the current property; he replied yes. Vice Chairman Neuer asked Mr. Scialla who took the photos; he said Justin Mihalik. Vice Chairman Neuer asked Mr. Scialla if he has been at the site since the photos were taken; he replied no. Vice Chairman Neuer stated for the record that Mr. Scialla cannot testify to the photos in Exhibit A-5. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Scialla if he visited the site or was at the applicant’s house; he replied no. Vice Chairman Neuer recommended that Exhibit A-5 not be entered into evidence.
Chairman Buechler stated that the witness just testified that the photos were accurate and they depict the current property; Mr. Vena said to scratch that from the testimony. Chairman Buechler said that Exhibit A-5 will not be entered into evidence and Mr. Scialla’s statement was struck from the record. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Scialla if he saw photos of the site when he was working on the application; he replied yes. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Scialla if he thought that the proposed garage will fit in with the other garages in the immediate area; he replied yes. Mr. Scialla presented Sheet A-2 of the building elevations and notes. Chairman Buechler stated that Sheet A-2 of the building elevations and notes dated 3/24/15 was pre-marked as Exhibit A-4 for identification. Mr. Vena referred to Exhibit A-4 and asked Mr. Scialla if he worked on this with Mr. Mahalic; he replied yes. Mr. Scialla referred to Exhibit A-4 and detailed it. He compared the building materials being proposed on the garage to the materials on the existing house. Mr. Vena asked Chairman Buechler if the applicant can come up and identify photograph P-1 on Exhibit A-5; he replied yes. Mr. Vena referred to Exhibit A-5 and asked Mr. Petrocelli if photograph P-1 accurately depicts his house; he replied yes. Chairman Buechler stated that photograph P-1 on Exhibit A-5 will be accepted as a photo of the applicant’s house and will be entered into evidence. Mr. Scialla presented the proposed garage and attic floor plans. Chairman Buechler stated that Sheet A-1 of the proposed garage and attic floor plans dated 3/24/15 were pre-marked as Exhibit A-3 for identification. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Scialla if there will be any spot lights on the proposed garage; he said no. Mr. Scialla said there will be lanterns on the garage. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Scialla if the materials being used on the proposed garage will match the materials on the existing house; he replied yes. Mr. Scialla referred to Exhibit A-3 and began detailing the floor plans.
Mr. Sussman referred to sheet SP-1 of Exhibit A-2 and noted for the record that the wood garden with the rail road ties around it was over the property line. Mr. Sussman asked Mr. Scialla if there was a patio right below the wood garden; he replied yes. Mr. Sussman asked Mr. Grygiel what the set-backs for patios are; he said that accessory structures are required to be five (5) feet from the property line but he does not think a patio has the same requirement. Mr. Schwarzbaum asked Mr. Petrocelli if there is an existing basketball court; he replied yes but they are going to remove it because that is where the garage will be constructed. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Petrocelli if they are putting the basketball court somewhere else on the property; he replied no. Mr. Schwarzbaum asked Mr. Scialla what the depth of a car will be in the garage; he said a car can be up to nineteen (19) feet in depth and the normal depth of a garage is twenty four (24) feet. There were no further questions for Mr. Scialla from the Board Members of the Board Professionals. There were no members of the public that had any questions for Mr. Scialla. Mr. Vena called their Professional Planner as his next witness. Peter VandenKooy approached the podium and was sworn under oath. Mr. Vandenkooy detailed his educational and professional background as a licensed Professional Planner in the State of New Jersey. He said that he has testified many times before in other Towns in New Jersey. Chairman Buechler accepted Mr. Vandenkooy as an expert in Professional Planning. Mr. Vandenkooy presented an aerial photo of the site. Chairman Buechler stated for the record that the aerial photo of the site dated 7/14/15 was pre- marked as Exhibit A-6 for identification. Mr. Vandenkooy referred to Exhibit A-6 and detailed the zoning of the site and the size of the lot. He stated that all of the surrounding lots are in an R-1 zone and detailed what the applicant is proposing. Mr. Vandenkooy detailed the properties in the immediate area and stated that he familiarized himself with the area and the other structures in the area. He said that he visited the site and is familiar with photo P-5 in Exhibit A-5 and that the structure in that photo is accurately depicted. Mr. Vena asked Mr. Vandenkooy if he prepared Exhibit A-6; he said that his firm did.
Vice Chairman Neuer asked Mr. Vandenkooy if he made any changes to Exhibit A-6; he replied no. Vice Chairman Neuer asked Mr. Vandenkooy where the aerial photo was taken from; he said from the DEP web site. Vice Chairman Neuer asked Mr. Vandenkooy if the DEP site provided a date when the aerial phot was taken; he said he does not have that information with him. Mr. Vandenkooy stated that there are a lot of larger accessory structures near the site and identified their location on Exhibit A-6. Mr. Vandenkooy stated that if the proposed garage was built any smaller it would not be as aesthetically appealing due to the size of the house and the property. He said that the proposed structure will be more complimentary at that size rather then what is allowed by Ordinance due to the area. Mr. Bullock stated that Mr. Vandenkooy cannot testify that Exhibit A-6 is the current condition of the site because he does not know what year the photo was taken. There were no further questions for Mr. Vandenkooy from the Board Members or the Board Professionals. There were no members of the public that had any questions for Mr. Vandenkooy. There were no members of the public that had any comments. Mr. Vena made his closing statement and asked the Board Members to approve the application. He said that the design is consistent with what is in Llewellyn Park and the applicant’s home. Chairman Buechler closed the hearing and opened the meeting up to Board discussion. Chairman Buechler made a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: e The wood garden depicted on Exhibit A-2 must be re-configured so that the rail road ties are on the applicant’s property when they build the garage. All the materials used on the garage must match the materials used on the existing house. The garage should not have any heat, air conditioning or plumbing except for a hose. The garage should have electrical outlets only, lights and power for an electric car. Applicant must file a deed restriction within ninety (90) days of the approval of the resolution that the garage cannot be used for living or have plumbing (except for the hose) or heating installed in it. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that the applicant is bound under testimony and seconded the motions to approve with said conditions.
Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Grygiel if he recommends any additional landscaping; he replied no. Ms. Weiss stated that she was pleased that Mr. Petrocelli’s neighbors are pleased and said that it is an attractive garage. The vote was as follows: Bullock: Yes Schwarzbaum: Yes Gabry: - Steinhart: - D. Nash: - Sussman: Yes Neuer: Yes Weiss: Yes Quentzel: Yes Chairman Buechler: Yes 2. ZB-15-10/T-Mobile Northeast LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Block: 155; Lot: 40.01; Zone: B-2 8 Rooney Circle Seeking permanent relief for temporary relief previously granted by the Zoning Board for a wireless communication facility. Gregory D. Meese, Esq., attorney for the applicant, approached the podium. Mr. Meese stated that the applicants came before this Board in 2012 requesting to establish a temporary wireless facility at 8 Rooney Circle and were approved at that time. He said they came back before this Board in April of this year asking for an extension of time to relocate the facility and were also approved at that time. Mr. Meese stated that the applicants went back to the owners of the property asking if they could make the temporary facility a permanent facility and this is why they are here tonight. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Meese if there are any changes to the original proposal; he said the only change is that they would like to make the fence permanent and lower it to 6” instead of 6°2”. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Meese to call all of the Professionals who wrote reports to testify that their reports are accurate; he complied. The following Professionals approached and were sworn under oath: Joseph Menio — Radio Frequency Engineer for T Mobile Timothy Kronk — Professional Planner Daniel Penesso — Radio Frequency Engineer for AT&T David Collins — Pinnacle Telecom Group Joshua Cottrell — Professional Engineer All testified that their reports were accurate except Mr. Penesso who did not submit a report. 10
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
c7ae1b2273304,994,211 bytes