May 21, 2015

Mr. Petry responded that these lights are bollards the light source is at 36 inches so its that high off the ground which shouldn’t be intrusive to anyone living behind it. A motion detector could be put on but he didn’t know if it would be worthwhile for something that low. Mr. McManigal thanked the Board and Mr. Petry and stepped down from the podium. Chairman Buechler asked if any other members of the public had any questions for Mr. Petry. Ms. Michal Kasher of 11 Barton Drive approached the podium. Ms. Kasher asked Mr. Petry if he could show the Board where Barton Drive is related to the site. Mr. Petry indicated that Barton Drive is located along the left side of all the plans. Ms. Kasher stated she was concerned that there was only one choice to exit from Barton Drive, Laurel Avenue, which is a County road with high traffic volume. She continued to ask Mr. Petry if he was ever at the site. Mr. Petry replied that not only has he been to the site but traveled Laurel Avenue to get to his office. Ms. Kasher asked Mr. Petry if he has been on Barton Drive and tried to exit the street on the right or left. Mr. Petry replied that he has been on both of the driveways that currently service the site. Ms. Kasher asked Mr. Petry if there were bushes along Laurel Avenue. Mr Petry replied that there was actually a stone wall along the frontage of the subject property and runs along the frontage of the corner property on Barton Drive and Laurel Avenue. Ms. Kasher was making statements to Mr. Petry regarding overgrown bushes. Mr.Quentzel and Chairman Buechler reminded her that she was to ask Mr. Petry questions not argue with him. Ms. Kasher continued to state how the bushes obstruct the view. Once again she was admonished by Chairman Buechler about asking questions only and she would have a chance at the very end if she wanted to make a statement to the Board. Chairman Buechler asked Mr. Petry if there were bushes along the front of the property. Mr. Petry replied that there are trees and shrubs along the front of the property behind the wall and have grown over the wall. He continued to state that actually the wall will be eliminated and the landscape will be pulled back from the road so to add better sight visibility and we have incorporated this into the plans. 11