January 21, 2016

Buechler: - Schwarzbaum: Yes to Deny DarConte: Yes to Deny Steinhart: Yes to Deny Gabry: Yes to Deny Sussman: Yes to Deny D. Nash: YestoDeny | Weiss: Yes to Deny Quentzel: Yes to Deny Chairman Neuer: Yes to Deny The vote for the request made by Travis McManigal for a re-vote on a request for a re-hearing of application ZB-14-08 was as follows: Buechler: - Schwarzbaum: Yes to Deny DarConte: - Steinhart: - Gabry: Yes to Deny Sussman: Yes to Deny D. Nash: Yes to Deny Weiss: Yes to Deny Quentzel: - Chairman Neuer: - Ms. Weiss stated that before they proceed that she would like to talk about an issue with the 90 day demolition condition in the adopted resolution for ZB-14-08. She said that she understands that it was not the applicant’s fault and the Board owes it to the objectors to explain this. Ms. Beirne said that there is an issue that was just brought to her attention two days ago regarding the 90 day demolition condition and that the 90 days expired and the demolition did not happen within that time. She said that it is not on the agenda tonight and she understands that the applicant has filed an application for the relief or waiver of that condition. Ms. Beirne stated that the applicant has to give full notice and when the Board Secretary puts it on the agenda the Board will discuss what to do at that meeting Chairman Neuer said that this issue is not before the Board at this time. He said that notice will be given to all the property owners within 200’ of the site and will be published in the local paper and anyone can call the Board Secretary to find out when the application is scheduled to be heard. Mr. Grygiel stated that he was asked to find out when the 90 day period clock started; if it is from the date of the adoption of the resolution or the date that the resolution is published. 5