November 17, 2016

Chairman Neuer stated for the record that it was discovered that this applicant did not include a variance for two principal uses on the property and it was not included in the notice. Ms. Moore stated that the variance appeared on the cover sheet of the plans from Dynamic Consultant. She said that the revised zoning chart on the first page of the recent submissions dated November 5, 2016 shows two principal uses on one lot. Chairman Neuer stated that although their engineer caught the additional variance which had been omitted, it was neither listed in the application nor included in the notice so this application cannot be heard tonight. Chairman Neuer said that, as stated at the last meeting, he was concerned about the agenda placement and he will recommend that this Board dismiss this application without prejudice. Ms. Moore said that the reason they asked that the application be carried was because they needed more time to make a complete site plan submission; she said it was not because they were lackadaisical. Ms. Moore said that she did not know that they needed an easement or development easements. She said that she objects that the application being dismissed and requests that the application be carried over to the next meeting. Ms. Moore said that they will provide notice to the Star Ledger and obtain an updated list of the properties within 200’ of the site. She said that the delay was that they were working tirelessly on the re-submissions. Chairman Neuer said that this all should have been done back in August and that the applicant dragged their heels. He said let us get it right and submit a full application; the applicant failed to ask for the additional variance. Ms. Moore stated that all of the professionals missed the variance. Chairman Neuer said that the Zoning Board does not do the applicant’s work for them. Ms. Moore stated for the record that she expects respect from the Chairman. She said that they know they missed the variance and that she objects that the Chairman said that they are dragging their feet. Ms. Moore said that the applicant hired another contractor so that for the Board to dismiss this application is prejudicial. She said that they will be ready for the next meeting. Chairman Neuer moved that the application be dismissed without prejudice; he said that the applicant would submit a new application and get a new

he said that they will be ready for the next meeting. Chairman Neuer moved that the application be dismissed without prejudice; he said that the applicant would submit a new application and get a new docket number and would be heard quickly.