April 5, 2017

successors or assigns construct or attempt to construct any improvement in conflict with or in violation of the terms of this approval, the Board hereby reserves the right to withdraw, amend or supplant the instant approval. 4. All construction, use and development of the property shall be in conformance with the plans approved herein, all representations of the Applicant and its witnesses during the public hearing, all exhibits introduced by the Applicant, and all terms and conditions of this resolution. 5. The Applicant shall pay all outstanding taxes, tax liens, application fees and technical review fees, as well as any inspection fees that may be required hereunder. The Applicant shall pay any additional fees or escrow deposits which may be due and owing within thirty (30) days of notification or this approval shall be deemed withdrawn. a All of the other terms and conditions of the original approval remain unchanged. The Board voted on the Application as follows: Motion: Mr. Weston Second: Mr. Eben Cardoza: : Eben: Yes Ghebremicael: Yes Klein: Yes Keigher: Yes McCartney: Yes Trenk: Yes Wegner: - Weston: Yes Wilkes: Yes Bagoff: Yes OTHER BUSINESS Chairman Bagoff stated he had a received a correspondence from Sanjeev Varghese, County Engineer, regarding the area of Northfield Avenue from the JCC to Cherry Lane. The County will not be undertaking renovation or modification to the area due to the topography of the land. There is currently no application before the Planning Board; the Board’s interest in this matter has ended at this time. PRESENTATION AMENDMENT TO ADOPTED FAIR SHARE PLAN PRESENTED BY: PAUL GRYGIEL, PP, AICP, TOWNSHIP PLANNER Mr. Grygiel gave a brief recapitulation of the history of the Fair Share Plan originally adopted by the Board in November 2008. He stated in the nine years since the plan was adopted there had been various Supreme Court and Appellate Court decisions, assorted changes and repeals in the COAH rules; with COAH essentially ceasing to function. Nonetheless, the Township still had an obligation to provide affordable housing. Unfortunately, the exact number of units remained unknown; no judgement had been determined regarding Essex County, but the Township was seeking to establish its number. In the meantime, the Township had been presented with an opportunity from Valley Road Residential at its site on Central

d regarding Essex County, but the Township was seeking to establish its number. In the meantime, the Township had been presented with an opportunity from Valley Road Residential at its site on Central Avenue. Shirley Bishop, (the Township’s Affordable Housing Consultant), had prepared the Amendment. It would provide the Township with 55 units of credit, plus any bonuses available for rental housing, smart growth, and various other transit oriented development projects yet to be determined. While the approved site plan would not be changed, the Township was proposing to amend the adopted Fair Share Plan to include 100 units of a mixed income rental development, 55 units would be low and moderate while 45 would be market rate units. Of the 55 affordable units, seven would be affordable to very low income households, 21 would be low income and 27 moderate income. The owner would be filing an application for the Mixed-Income Nine Percent Tax Credit Round on May