May 3, 2017

Chairman Bagoff stated there was a swimming pool next to the tennis courts; he asked if that area would be fenced off from the Public. Mr. Wlodychak said yes, the pool area would be fenced off. Chairman Bagoff asked what arrangements had been made for snow plowing the tennis area and winterizing the structure with the wood-slat walking area leading to the courts. Mr. Wlodychak said he would probably hire someone to plow the area; he said he would install a non-slip material to the wood-slat area that was approximately 20 ft. long. Mr. Dwyer said he was researching permitted uses in the zone; Mr. Grygiel seemed to indicate the (tennis) structure was separate from the Country Club permitted use..Mr. Dwyer read Section 25-24.2(c) (Private Club): (1) Parking lot entrances and exits shall be clearly visible from the public street and shail not be located within 75 ft. of an intersection; (2) There shall be a 25 ft. wide buffer adjacent to all residential property lines, within the required setback, which shall consist of natural vegetation; (3) All structures shall be designed to be complementary to the neighborhood; and (4) There must be a landscape plan approved and kept on file (in the Planning Department). Mr. Russoniello asked how the recreational use facility differed from the Country Club. Mr. Dwyer answered that Mr. Wlodychak testified that the structure operated as its own entity separate from the Country Club, including its own revenue stream, own hours and own employees. Mr. Dwyer opined in that regard it was not so much a separate recreational facility as much as a private club leasing space from a private club. Mr. Dwyer stated he believed the use was accessory and permitted in the zone. Vice Chairman Klein asked the months of operation, would it be open year round, and was the County Club open year round; Mr. Wlodychak stated the structure would be operating from October 1 through April 15. He currently had no plans to run the business year round, he believed the Country Club closed for a month or so during the winter months. Mr. Dwyer advised the Board he had one other clarification under the definitions; he said a private recreation facility referred to a court or related structures provided as an accessory use on the same lot as a residence. He stated this use did not qualify as such; it was not a private recreational facility such as a

referred to a court or related structures provided as an accessory use on the same lot as a residence. He stated this use did not qualify as such; it was not a private recreational facility such as a tennis court behind a home. The Public had no questions for Mr. Wlodychak. Jan Ligas, Jr., was sworn in under oath. He stated he was President and one of the owners of Arizon Structures, a St. Louis, MO, based company; the supplier of the proposed temporary building structure. Mr. Ligas stated it was an air-supported structure; it was required by code to have a triple redundancy to maintain the air pressure under all conditions. There was a primary fan that ran consistently, a secondary electric fan with the same capability as primary fan; it sits on standby, and the back-up generator. The units were residential grade; the mechanical decibels would meet decibel levels at the property line. He stated the propane tanks met all required guidelines; the tank supplier could explain guidelines.