October 4, 2017

members of the Public, and had also increased the scope of the Application. He opined that the removal of that portion of the Application changed the type of the Application from a Major to Minor Site Plan. There would be some brief testimony from Applicant’s architect, Wayne Jacques, in reply to comments based on revisions and from Applicant's engineer, Jeffrey Morris, Boswell Engineering, to testify on engineering and planning. Mr. Angowski stated the Applicant had initially proposed a new exit driveway; however, after receiving comments from the Board and Public, the Applicant determined to remove the proposed driveway from the plan. The Applicant was concerned about the environmental impact of tree removal and the Public comments stating the lack of a necessity for a new driveway. By removing the driveway, the Applicant would save many trees. The Applicant also conducted a safety analysis and believed the driveway safe as it currently existed; however, they still maintained the proposed driveway might have provided an optimization of egress from the property. The Applicant had also conducted an OPRA request to the Township for accident reports from the past five years and determined that no accidents had occurred within that period at the club’s current point of egress. The club would ensure the site triangle would be be clear so that vehicles exiting both left and right had a clear line of sight. Mr. Angowski called Wayne J. Jacques, AIA, JGA Architectural Design, to the podium to address the comments he had received from the Township professionals regarding his revised plans. Mr. Dwyer advised Mr. Jacques he had testified previously and was still under oath. Mr. Jacques responded to Mr. Keller's review memo dated 9/29/17; referencing Item #39, (‘The dumpster enclosure detail should be revised to include its width and footing information The response letter indicated that this information is shown on sheet AO.1, but has not been provided.”), Mr. Jacques stated he would resubmit the sheet with all the required information. Referencing Item #40, (Architectural plans should show materials and colors for the proposed improvements.), he stated he would also resubmit revised sheets A5.1, A5.2 and A5.3 clarifying all requested details. Mr. Keller stated he was satisfied with Mr. Jacques testimony; he advised the Board to make it a condition of any approval

resubmit revised sheets A5.1, A5.2 and A5.3 clarifying all requested details. Mr. Keller stated he was satisfied with Mr. Jacques testimony; he advised the Board to make it a condition of any approval the Board would grant to have the Applicant provide the information as testified. Chairman Bagoff asked the Board if they had any questions for Mr. Jacques. Mr. Eben stated there were approximately a half-dozen dumpsters on the site, he understood the plan referenced the main dumpster, but he wanted to know about all the other ones on the property. Mr. Angowski stated a representative of the club could answer the question. The Public Advocate had no questions for Mr. Jacques. Chairman Bagoff asked the Public if they had questions for Mr. Jacques. Robert Rashkes, 35 Oak Crest Road, stated (the Applicant) had performed a traffic study about accidents occurring at the existing exit driveway; he asked if the accident analysis also covered the entire perimeter of the property area from Eagle Rock Avenue to the club’s property line. Mr. Angowski stated the Applicant had not done a traffic study; the WOPD provided the accident report information in reply to OPRA request submitted by Applicant. The area of the report covered the most recent five-year period for the area of Eagle Rock Avenue between Laurel Avenue and Wakeman Street; he stated that although there had