October 4, 2017

disturb the steep slope in the area of the small section to install the two water lines, and the area between the pool house. He stated the new plan proposed a net gain of fifteen trees. Regarding the parking lot plan, Mr. Morris stated they reduced the area of pavement in auxiliary lot area and replaced with tree plantings, the plan reorganized the club’s parking lot to include the addition of two spaces near the pool area for a total of 249 parking spaces. Mr. Morris stated that since the previous meeting, he had the course arborist review the trees questioned for removal. The arborist had determined that all the trees were dead or dying and should be removed; he listed the trees slated for removal. In response to question from Mr. Angowski, Mr. Morris stated the revised plan made the parking lot much more organized; islands would be installed to further channelize traffic; he believed he had optimized the maximum possible number of parking spaces. In response to a resident's question from the previous meeting regarding installing a chairlift instead of a ramp, Mr. Morris explained that for this project, a ramp would provide better access for all persons. In addition to making the area ADA accessible, it would make it easier for parents who had young children in strollers. Mr. Morris stated the revised plan improved the site’s impervious coverage, making it slightly less. In response inquiry from Mr. Dwyer, Mr. Morris stated the existing maximum lot coverage was 8.42%, proposed was 8.45%; the maximum lot coverage permitted (in R-2 Zone) was 30%. Mr. Angowski asked that Mr. Morris respond to Mr. Keller’s review memo dated 9/29/17; Mr. Keller stated that if Applicant agreed to complete all requests, it was not necessary to respond point-by-point before the Board. Mr. Angowski stated he would like to clarify that a couple of Items had already been satisfied - Item #20, (Copy and/or delineation of any existing or proposed deed restrictions or covenants.) and Item #21, (Any existing or proposed easement or land reserved for or dedicated to public use.) Mr. Keller confirmed the items were satisfied. He stated the only easement the Applicant would have to deal with was the one with Public Service — they had an easement for lights, but it had no impact from a land use perspective. Mr. Keller stated Item #45 (Landscaping plan & details prepared by a

e to deal with was the one with Public Service — they had an easement for lights, but it had no impact from a land use perspective. Mr. Keller stated Item #45 (Landscaping plan & details prepared by a professional landscape architect.), was for the Board's action; it was an ordinance requirement. Under State regulations, engineers were permitted to sign for landscape plans. He stated it was technically a waiver to Township ordinance. Mr. Angowski stated he was formally requesting the waiver. Mr. Angowski stated if Mr. Keller did not wish to discuss the memo point-by-point, he would defer to him if he did have any questions for Mr. Morris. Chairman Bagoff suggested Mr. Morris testify to those items in need of further discussion. Item #4, (Engineer shall provide testimony regarding the guard booth.), Mr. Morris stated the booth would be removed. Item #6, (The island at the northern end of the single loaded parking bay adjacent to the service court should be extended to reduce the pavement area.), and Item #21, (...Consideration should be given to reducing the large pavement area in the parking lot adjacent to the loading/refuse area...). Mr. Keller asked Mr. Morris consider to make the areas more defined and attractive. Mr. Morris stated that because of the turning movements in some parts of the service area and golf cart traffic in other areas, he was reluctant to 5