May 2, 2018

Mr. Wegner voiced concern that the previous stipulations should be included as conditions of approval. Mr. Cardoza asked if a staircase from the future area work better than a sidewalk; Mr. Petry answered that a staircase would allow access to the upper parking lot (Lot G), but there was not a sidewalk in Lot G to the front door of the main building. Mr. Grygiel asked Mr. Williams to confirm the Applicant agreed with Stipulation 10 of the original approval identifying the Planning Director or Zoning officer as the Township Officials. Mr. Williams answered in the affirmation. Mr. Keller stated the only condition that would not carry forward from the original approval was Condition 12. Referring to Items #1 and #2 of his report (dated 4/25/18), Mr. Keller stated it was Mr. Petry’s testimony that 592 parking spaces were required based on the square footage of what was in the main building, plus the two existing outer buildings if all was used as medical offices. Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative. Mr. Keller stated there were currently 457 spaces; Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative. Mr. Keller stated the Applicant was requesting a deviation for 113 parking spaces; Mr. Williams confirmed the deviation was 113. Mr. Keller stated grading needed to be addressed for the handicapped spaces; Mr. Petry stated there were currently 16 (handicapped) spaces throughout the area; he stated if parking were to be developed for the two out building, handicapped parking would be developed which might slightly increase impervious coverage. Mr. Keller asked if directional signage had yet been considered for the site; Mr. Petry stated there was signage for current tenants, additional signage would be addressed as required. Mr. Keller asked what had been considered for refuse and recycling for the two buildings; Mr. Petry stated both buildings had lower levels, depending on the uses the garage might be stored inside; no final plan had yet been considered. Chairman Bagoff noted that Council President McCartney joined the meeting at approximately 8:05 P.M. Vice Chairman Weston opined he would rather see the areas restriped and not add impervious coverage. Mr. Petry stated it would be for a total of two (2) spaces, one handicapped space per building. Referring to the parking table summary, Mr. Klein stated some parking areas appeared under- utilized; he asked Mr. Petry for

ould be for a total of two (2) spaces, one handicapped space per building. Referring to the parking table summary, Mr. Klein stated some parking areas appeared under- utilized; he asked Mr. Petry for clarification. Mr. Petry stated a dialysis center occupied half of the third floor that was served by Parking Area A; most of the patients were dropped off and remained on-site for eight hours. The other half of the third floor was currently vacant. In Parking Area A, 40 spaces would be available for future tenant, and there was additional parking in all three sections underneath the building for employees. The intent of the plan was for the parking areas servicing the doors to buildings were for patrons; the more remote areas were for employees. Chairman Bagoff asked Mr. Dwyer if the Applicant would again be required to appear before the Board with a new site plan to build a sidewalk from the future parking area (the 22 “banked’

spaces). Mr. Petry stated the Applicant would agree to submit a new plan in the future or consider it a condition of approval to the current Application. Mr. Keller stated there was significant grade change from building to building; an engineering plan would have to be submitted including a grading plan. The Public Advocate and Public had no questions for Mr. Petry. The Public had no comments on the Application. Chairman Bagoff closed the public hearing; the Board deliberated. Conditions: 1. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Township, County, State and Federal laws, ordinances, regulations and directives, including without limitation, obtaining all applicable local, state and federal approvals and/or permits. Without limitation of the foregoing, prior to the signing of the approved site plans, and prior to the commencement of any land disturbance or construction, the Applicant shall submit to this Board, with a copy to the Board Engineer, proof that it has obtained all required governmental approvals. 2. If another governmental entity or agency grants a waiver or variance affecting the plans and/or exhibits submitted by the Applicant, this approval or the conditions attached to it, then the Applicant shall re-apply to this Board respecting the same and this Board shall have the right to view that issue as it relates to this approval and these conditions and modify and amend same, if appropriate. 3. In the event that any other required regulatory approval conflicts with the terms and conditions hereof, or materially alters the same, or the terms and conditions hereof are materially altered by any change in applicable law or regulation other than those municipal regulations for which change is prohibited by the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), or in the event Applicant or its successors or assigns construct or attempt to construct any improvement in conflict with or in violation of the terms of this approval, the Board hereby reserves the right to withdraw, amend or supplant the instant approval. 4. All construction, use and development of the property shall be in conformance with the plans approved herein, all representations of the Applicant and its witnesses during the public hearing, all exhibits introduced by the Applicant, and all terms and conditions of this resolution. 5. The Applicant shall pay all outstanding taxes, tax liens,

nt and its witnesses during the public hearing, all exhibits introduced by the Applicant, and all terms and conditions of this resolution. 5. The Applicant shall pay all outstanding taxes, tax liens, application fees and technical review fees, as well as any inspection fees that may be required hereunder. The Applicant shall pay any additional fees or escrow deposits which may be due and owing within thirty (30) days of notification or this approval shall be deemed withdrawn.

10. All notes included in the approved plans, including notes required by this Resolution, shall be deemed conditions of approval having the same force and effect as conditions expressly set forth in this Resolution. All conditions of approval shall be written on the plans. Applicant shall construct the sidewalk from the future parking area (the 22 “banked” spaces) to the main parking area upon approval from the Board for the future parking area. The Applicant will restripe the existing spaces adjacent to the residential structures to create handicapped spaces, if required at the time it seeks to rent, use or sell the residential structures. The restriping of the spaces for handicapped parking will result in a reduction of parking spaces from 457 to 455. In the event the Board notifies the Applicant that the 22 “banked” spaces must be constructed, Applicant shall return to the Board to amend the site plan. Condition No. 12 in the Resolution of this Board adopted on November 5, 2008 is hereby excised. All other conditions of that Resolution remain in full force and effect. The Board voted on the Application as follows: Motion: Vice Chairman Weston Second: Chairman Bagoff Cardoza: Yes Wegner: Yes Keigher: Yes Weston: Yes Klein: Yes Wilkes: Yes McCartney: Absent Bagoff: Yes McPherson: Yes Trenk: Absent Chairman Bagoff announced a brief recess at approximately 8:35 P.M. He reconvened the meeting at approximately 8:39 P.M. PRESENTATION West Orange Survey of Older Adults: A Summary of Findings, February 2018. Presented by Councilwoman Michelle Casalino DISCUSSION: Councilwoman Casalino approached the podium and addressed the Board. She gave a recapitulation of the Senior Survey presented to the Township Council on March 27, 2018. She stated the survey focused on transportation, housing, health, and communication; among the issues identified in the report were the limited options for affordable housing for older adults in West Orange and poor walkability options.

The Board discussed the report findings with Councilwoman Casalino. The Board requested Mr. Grygiel research housing options for older adults for discussion at a futu meeting. Harvey Grossman, Public Advocate, voiced concern about the relationship between the Township and County regarding walkability. The Public had no questions or comments on the presentation. MEETING ADJOURNED at approximately 9:13 P.M. Minutes adopted July 11, 2018. Robin Miller, Secretary Township of West Orange Planning Board THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD WILL BE WEDNESDAY AUGUST 1, 2018 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. re 10