May 2, 2018

Mr. Wegner voiced concern that the previous stipulations should be included as conditions of approval. Mr. Cardoza asked if a staircase from the future area work better than a sidewalk; Mr. Petry answered that a staircase would allow access to the upper parking lot (Lot G), but there was not a sidewalk in Lot G to the front door of the main building. Mr. Grygiel asked Mr. Williams to confirm the Applicant agreed with Stipulation 10 of the original approval identifying the Planning Director or Zoning officer as the Township Officials. Mr. Williams answered in the affirmation. Mr. Keller stated the only condition that would not carry forward from the original approval was Condition 12. Referring to Items #1 and #2 of his report (dated 4/25/18), Mr. Keller stated it was Mr. Petry’s testimony that 592 parking spaces were required based on the square footage of what was in the main building, plus the two existing outer buildings if all was used as medical offices. Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative. Mr. Keller stated there were currently 457 spaces; Mr. Petry answered in the affirmative. Mr. Keller stated the Applicant was requesting a deviation for 113 parking spaces; Mr. Williams confirmed the deviation was 113. Mr. Keller stated grading needed to be addressed for the handicapped spaces; Mr. Petry stated there were currently 16 (handicapped) spaces throughout the area; he stated if parking were to be developed for the two out building, handicapped parking would be developed which might slightly increase impervious coverage. Mr. Keller asked if directional signage had yet been considered for the site; Mr. Petry stated there was signage for current tenants, additional signage would be addressed as required. Mr. Keller asked what had been considered for refuse and recycling for the two buildings; Mr. Petry stated both buildings had lower levels, depending on the uses the garage might be stored inside; no final plan had yet been considered. Chairman Bagoff noted that Council President McCartney joined the meeting at approximately 8:05 P.M. Vice Chairman Weston opined he would rather see the areas restriped and not add impervious coverage. Mr. Petry stated it would be for a total of two (2) spaces, one handicapped space per building. Referring to the parking table summary, Mr. Klein stated some parking areas appeared under- utilized; he asked Mr. Petry for

ould be for a total of two (2) spaces, one handicapped space per building. Referring to the parking table summary, Mr. Klein stated some parking areas appeared under- utilized; he asked Mr. Petry for clarification. Mr. Petry stated a dialysis center occupied half of the third floor that was served by Parking Area A; most of the patients were dropped off and remained on-site for eight hours. The other half of the third floor was currently vacant. In Parking Area A, 40 spaces would be available for future tenant, and there was additional parking in all three sections underneath the building for employees. The intent of the plan was for the parking areas servicing the doors to buildings were for patrons; the more remote areas were for employees. Chairman Bagoff asked Mr. Dwyer if the Applicant would again be required to appear before the Board with a new site plan to build a sidewalk from the future parking area (the 22 “banked’