Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Date unavailable

PB-19-01/Washington Street WO, LLC

Preserved file SHA-256a2e3f91b7c8c02b18f9e07a4bcc47f49e34b0b28bab9cda970e4b14545de0c99

Indexed text · page 2

Show all pages
Page 2

Vv. Certification of Owner’s Authorization; vi. Site Plan Checklist; vii. Sustainability Checklist Form; viii. | Copy of Planning Board Resolution adopted on July 11, 2018; ix. Copy of Planning Board Resolution adopted on October 15, 2015; m Engineering Plan and Architectural Drawings prepared by Nick Tsapatsaris & Associates dated April 1, 2017 last revised December 20, 2018 (Sheets T-001, SP-101, SP-102, SP-201, SP-301, SP-401, SP-501, SP-502, SP-503., SP-504, PA-101, PA-201. The following Exhibits were admitted into evidence: Ex. A-1 Site Lighting and Hardscape Plan (Sheet SP-401 last revised April 2, 2019 Ex A-2 Proposed Preliminary First Floor Plan (Sheet PA-101) last revised April 16, 2019 Ex. A-3 Proposed Preliminary Building Elevations (Sheet PA-201) last revised April 16, 2019 Lawrence Cutalo, Esq. introduced the application on behalf of the Applicant noting that the Applicant seeks to amend the previously granted approval to comply with environmental regulations concerning the Wigwam Brook. Applicant called Nick Tsapatsaris PE, RA who was sworn and qualified as an expert in engineering and architecture. Mr. Tsapatsaris testified that Applicant seeks to expand the existing 2,835+/- sf building, however; due to constraints having to do with proximity to the floodway zone for the Wigwam Brook the formerly approved addition must be re-shaped. Rather than a rectangular addition it will now be trapezoidal in shape, and rather than being 2,538 sf the revised addition will be 2,523 sf. The new addition would be adjacent to the outer boundary of the floodway zone. Applicant still seeks to use the premises for a self-serve laundromat. Mr. Tsapatsaris reviewed each of the sheets in the engineering and architectural plans prepared by his office and explained that the revised application would require one additional variance, namely, a rear yard setback variance (30° required 18.98” proposed). Mr. Tsapatsaris addressed the review letters from the Board Planner and Consulting Engineer. It was noted that many of the comments had already been incorporated in the revised plans and the remaining comments would be addressed in the future. Mr. Tsapatsaris testified that Applicant would install two trees in the parking lot which would eliminate one variance.

File revisions (1)