PB-19-04/Prism Capital Partners, LLC

\ ASSOCIATES Chairman and Members of the West Orange Township Planning Board September 6, 2019 Re: Prism Capital Partners, LLC (PB 19-04) Our File No. VWRP0115.01 Preliminary & Final Major Site Plan with Page 4 “C" Variances and Tree Removal Permit Application Review #1 c. 2. The Applicant has not requested any de minimis exceptions from the RSIS. DESIGN COMMENTS AND PLAT DETAILS 1. As stipulated in the Site Plan/Subdivision Checklist, the following information must be submitted to the Board: a) Item #20 — Copy and/or delineation of any existing or proposed deed restrictions or covenants. b) Item #46 — Solid waste management plan. c) Item #52 - Plans and legal documents for compliance with West Orange COAH Ordinances. 2. As stipulated in Section 25-13 of the Land Use Regulations, the Applicant must submit twenty (20) copies of an Environmental Impact Statement to the Board. 3. The Applicant is proposing to develop only a small portion of existing lot 15. The Applicant should address the Board to clarify if the 20 stacked townhomes that are now proposed will be part of a larger single association which will encompass the entire lot or if the current project will be subdivided from the larger parcel. 4. The Applicant should address the Board regarding compliance with the new building design requirements in the Second Amendment to Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 5. It states on the Sustainability Checklist Form that “The Applicant is proposing reduction of peak stormwater runoff rates leaving the site helping to mitigate the potential for downstream flooding”. We note that this statement is not substantiated by the Hydrology Report which states on page 6 ”...the peak rate and runoff volume under the proposed conditions is equal to the existing conditions”. 6. It states on the Sustainability Checklist Form that that the list of green and recycled building materials in new construction, renovation and maintenance is ‘to be determined”. The Applicant should provide testimony to the Board to clarify the status of this item. 7. It shows on the Civil Plans that the proposed townhomes will front on Babcock Street. However, Tax Map sheet 44 identifies this street as Babcock Place. Therefore, the Civil Plans must be revised accordingly. 8. The orientation of the North arrow shown on sheet 0.1 of the Civil Plans does not agree with the orientation shown on

reet as Babcock Place. Therefore, the Civil Plans must be revised accordingly. 8. The orientation of the North arrow shown on sheet 0.1 of the Civil Plans does not agree with the orientation shown on the Boundary Survey and must be corrected. SAWest Orango\Planning BoardiVWRPO1 15.01 - Prism Capital Partners, LLC MjSPIReview #1 09-06-2019 doc