Minutes · Jun 3, 2020
June 3, 2020
dcc0d9373ae9d6ee5184e62dbba96f5da2aed3860aa9ddefdab2b6817c14d00aIndexed text · page 6
Show all pageso Mr. Chaplin stated that the Applicant can no build into land they do not own, but will study Mr. Grygiel inquired about connections within the development between the buildings to the amenities? o Mr. Chaplin zoomed into Exhibit A-3 to show all connections Mr. Grygiel stated that the dog park called for 20’ tall light fixtures; and asked if this was needed o Mr. Chaplin stated that change was in process to remove them; no intention for dog park to be opened at night Public Questions: Questions were asked by: Kevin Malanga, 57 Ridge Road Lynda Novick, 1 Buckingham Road Roz Moskowitz Bielski, 11 Wedgewood Drive Lisa Rosenberg, 18 Buckingham Road End of Mr. Chaplin’s Testimony There was a recess beginning at 9:03P.M.; meeting resumed at 9:08P.M. Chairman Weston Introduced the Applicant’s Architect, Jack Raker Mr. Raker provided credentials and was sworn in Introduced and discussed the following exhibits: © A-21: cover sheet o A+ building A, 2°? floor plan, built around 3 courtyards, main entry off motor court, described interior details and amenities, 304 dwelling units, garage has 570 Spaces o A-23: example of a similar existing building interiors as is intended for this development A-24: example of a similar package delivery area A-25: example of a similar interior lounge area A-26: example of a similar refreshment/lounge/work area A-27: example of a similar fitness center A-28: elevation drawing from side (front and back) and how there are different exterior looks for different sections © A-29: side view of wood detailing and stone at entry eoo0000
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
dcc0d9373ae92,925,263 bytes