April 7, 2021 Adopted Planning Board Minutes

And not be included in the height. That's what I thought, so it won't change the variance of risk. No Public Questions Mr. Alpert testimony concludes. - Mr. Charles Heydt entered on the record, sworn in by Mr. McPherson and was accepted by the Board as an expert in Planning. - Architecture for this application relates to the design and agrees that the additional building height does provide for some architectural comments through the main location, but noticing elevation residential lobby also increased the rate to account for the flood hazard area. -Mr. Heydt explained that these plans substantially comply with all the other requirements of this redevelopment plan. Eventhough the signage was raised an issue the applicant will comply. With respect to the substantial detriment and public welfare, that staircase should be exempt with spectrum building height calculation. He then suggested moving the staircase closer to Central Ave as it would probably be a beneficial location for that. This application is trying to limit the impact on general welfare, but I don't see any substantial impact here with this application. Board Questions -Mr. Johnson asked about density per acre and if it is mixed use. Mr. Heydt answered that it is approximately 70 per acre. - Mr. Johnson asked about the amount of buffer areas. Mr Heydt said there were two instead of one and both of them require a variance. - Mr. Johnson asked about the rationale for the staircase being moved. Mr. Heydt said that Central Ave is an impact street so visually speaking to mitigating the impacts of the back to Pop Element. But Central Ave is more the primary St, so sometimes you just watt to reduce impact altogether. -Councilwoman McCartney asked about a traffic study. Mr. Heydt responded that from this sort of mixed use development there wasn't one required. Professionals Questions -No questions ftdrn Mr. Hess. - Ms. Spach Trachan said heard the planner testify about the building height variance to the parapet and asked Mr. Heydt to provide testimony about the building, the variance to the lower roof lines. Mr. Heydt said that 22 Central Avenue is a five story structure as well. If you look at them, they are materially similar. Public Questions/Comments No questions/comments from Public Public Portion of Application is Closed Discussion - Chairman Bagoff read into the record the

look at them, they are materially similar. Public Questions/Comments No questions/comments from Public Public Portion of Application is Closed Discussion - Chairman Bagoff read into the record the “Pro Forma Site Plan- Conditions of Approval”. -Mr. McPherson discussed the conditions as the ones that were specifically mentioned and try to run through this. Clients with the color ordinance bill was that specifically mention yes yes OK. The other one I have here is the easement needed for the public. I guess the public parking easement or other legal document. OK. And the easement should be in perpetuity. Moving ahead sustainability checklist to be submitted. OK, this is the applicant shall work with the DP and conjunction with the township's office of the Manage of Emergency Management. On this is on the. I forgot what particular I think what I would 14