December 7, 2011

feet for office space will be built. Mr, Church said that the existing drive-though space will be eliminated. The majority of the first floor will be raised. The construction materials will be of steel frame with tan stucco finish on the exterior. There will be ledge stone veneer below the windows. The color of the stucco will be tan, with darker tan on trim. The standing seam will be green on metal frame. Mr. Church referred to Exhibit A-2. He said All-Signs did the sign graphics. The elevations will be torn down and rebuilt. Mr. Russoniello referred to Director Borg’s November 28, 2011 Planner’s Report. He said the existing freestanding sign will remain, and all the signs will have individual lettering as per Director’s Borg recommendation. The fencing on eastern side of the property will be replaced with a new fence. Mr. Weston said that the rest rooms did not appear to be ADA compliant; he said the final plans must indicate that the rest rooms were ADA compliant. Mr. Weston asked Mr. Church for rest room window details; he also asked Mr. Church to explain the window details along the right side of the building, stating there should be uniformity to their placement; the current plan indicated a haphazard window placement. Mr. Weston said the plans indicated one staircase; he wanted to know if one staircase only was compliant. Mr, Church said that the final plans would indicate the building was ADA compliant. He said that the plan schematics were conceptual, and the windows would be determined by incoming tenant requirements. Chairman Bagoff inquired that if so much of the plan schematics were conceptual, then how exactly would be the final plans change. Mr. Church said the plan was for four first level stores and six offices on the second floor. The Board discussed the need to have the basement square footage included in the plans. Mr. Weston said the basement square footage was an issue that may affect the number of parking spaces. Mr. Church said the basement would only be used for storage. Harvey Grossman, Public Advocate, asked for more information regarding the design of the front entrance and the lighting details. He wanted to know the height of the fixtures and the type of the fixtures to be installed, The Board discussed the need to see plans with greater lighting details. There were no questions from the public. Anthony Marucci, PP, PE

f the fixtures and the type of the fixtures to be installed, The Board discussed the need to see plans with greater lighting details. There were no questions from the public. Anthony Marucci, PP, PE was sworn in and accepted as a professional witness. Mr, Marucci said he had prepared the field survey for the application. He discussed the existing conditions. Mr. Marucci said the addition will remove the drive-through area, but everything else will stay the same. The impervious surface will remain the same; and there is more than enough parking. Mr. Russonicllo referred to Director Lepore’s comments from his Engincer’s Report dated November 28, 2011: Director Lepore’s report indicated more information was needed regarding the rear parking lot; the drainage; the lighting plan; the parking area conditions; traffic NAPLANNING, BRD\WP\MINUTES\2011\12-7-11 Minutes.doc 3