October 21, 2021 Regular Meeting

gave her credentials and was accepted as an Expert in Architecture by the Board. e Ms. Doherty said that the main aspect of the application is for minor additions to garage. She stated that the garage presently existing is too small for a modern vehicle. e Dr. Michael Straker joined meeting at 8:16PM. Applicant chose to start again with their presentation so Dr. Straker could vote on the application. Mr. Reichman explained in further detail the work being done. BOARD QUESTIONS ° Acting Chairman Ricci asked if this is a single-family residence with the intention of keeping it that way. Mr. Reichman responded in the affirmative. PRESENTATION ¢ Ms. Nancy Dougherty reentered the record and explained the goal of the project. o The house addition will give maximum lot coverage. o Setback proposal to keep garage in original location. BOARD QUESTIONS © Acting Chairman Ricci asked if it is a full foundation (ic. not going to be open underneath.) Ms. Dougherty answered in the negative; she stated that it is not a continuous foundation throughout the footprint of the house. ¢ Mr. Ricci followed up by asking if the materials for the garage will match the house. Ms. Dougherty stated that the materials will match the house with cedar siding and an asphalt shingle roof. PROFESSIONAL QUESTIONS Ms. Spach Trahan asked if the setback will have negative impact on community properties. Ms. Dougherty explained that the intention of the application is to keep the original location, will not be any closer to the side yard and have no negative impact. BOARD DISCUSSION ¢ Mr. Ricci advised applicant to let neighbors know of the excavation prior to it occurring. NO PUBLIC QUESTIONS /COMMENT ¢ Mr. Reichman asked how long variance is good for; Ms. Beirne said she would speak to him off camera. Mr. Ricci explained that it is usually two (2) years and then that approval expires meaning Mr. Reichman would have to return to the Board.