January 21, 2021 Regular Meeting

vegetation. Ms. Gabry inquired if the matting would remain after construction; and asked how susceptible it is to weather events. o Mr. Martell stated that the matting will ultimately become part of the land o Mr. Hess added that the addition of the matting was a topic that he discussed with Mr. Martell and that this is acceptable. Public Questions Charles Upshaw, 105 Roosevelt Avenue; asked if the line of disturbance is within 100’ of the ridge line. o Mr. Martell responded that, in parts, yes Mr. Upshaw stated that Ordinance 25-28.8:B stated that the line of disturbance must be no closer than 100’ from the ridge line. co Mr. Martell responded that the application is seeking relief from this. Mr. Upshaw asked if the matting will be effective in areas exceeding the standard. o Mr. Martell responded in the affirmative. Mr. Upshaw asked about current trees with exposed roots and if the vibrations of digging will affect them. o Mr. Martell responded in the negative. Manuel Lin, 938 Pleasant Valley Way; asked about details of the storm drainage system. o Chairman Neuer stated that this was discussed a few meetings back. Kevin Malanga, 57 Ridge Road; asked about the sequence of digging, matting, landscaping; is this the order, and will trees be dragged up the slope to be planted? o Mr. Martell responded that this is the order, and that the landscapers have a way to get the trees up the slope that would not be considered “dragging.” Mr. Malanga continued asking about if the matting will be disturbed by the landscaping work. o Mr. Martell stated that it would and it is expected. o Chairman Neuer asked for details on the process of repairing any damage to the matting. co Mr. Martell responded that there are recognized and acceptable methods. Mr. Malanga asked about the specifics of the matting vs. a retaining wall; which is more suitable. o Mr. Martell responded that the matting is appropriate for this application. Mr. Malanga continued to question matting vs. walls. o Mr. Martell responded that the rear sub grade portion of the building acts as a retaining wall, and matting goes down beyond that. Zasah Khademi, 4 Dawes Avenue; asked if the NIH is considered a reliable source, continuing that NIH standards would recommend a green roof vs. an artificial turf roof due to its off-gassing and runoff into drain water. o Chairman Neuer responded that any evidence

reliable source, continuing that NIH standards would recommend a green roof vs. an artificial turf roof due to its off-gassing and runoff into drain water. o Chairman Neuer responded that any evidence of these standards and issues should be forwarded to the Board Attorney via the Board Secretary. Chairman Neuer called a recess at 10:05pm; the hearing resumed at 10:15 Mr. Upshaw returned to ask Mr. Martell if the sheer strength of the soil will be sufficient for the matting to be used. o Mr. Martell responded in the affirmative. o Chairman Neuer referred Mr. Upshaw to a report linked to the Agenda. Mr. Upshaw stated that sheer strength of the soil is not discussed.