October 20, 2022 (Regular Meeting)

Mr. Fowler’s testimony concluded. PRESENTATION Mr. Sean Moronski, Planner was sworn under oath and credentials were accepted by the Board. Mr. Moronski testified referencing Sheet 101 with a revision date of August 13, 2021 that the dumpster and gate with height of the wall has two purposes. Mr. Moronski also testified referencing the North and South Plyon Signs updates to the Essex Green Boards. Mr. Moronski said in regards to the criteria for the property as there will be no interference with the line of sight in regards to the signage. He also stated that the sign and lighting for said signage is consistent with the Ordinance. He testified further stating that parking spaces will remain the same. NO BOARD QUESTIONS NO PROFESSIONALS QUESTIONS PUBLIC QUESTIONS Mr. Kevin Malanga (57 Ridge Road) asked if the South Plyon sign is going to read “Essex Green” on the top and the bottom. Mr. Moronski answered in the affirmative that it is now shown on the plans as a merge of the two signs. Mr. Malanga asked if the dumpsters will have integral coverage. Mr. Moronski answered in the affirmative. PUBLIC COMMENT Mr. Kevin Malanga (57 Ridge Road) was sworn under oath, and confirmed that he does not reside within 200 feet of the application property. Mr. Malanga asked for supplemental submission due to the fact that this application has a lot of “unknowns” in regards to what will actually be done and when different things will be taken care of. BOARD DISCUSSION Chairperson Neuer made a motion to approve of application in part in regards to the installation of the dumpster and enclosure in the location where Building 1 is proposed to be built in the future. In the event that Building I is constructed, applicant will have to return to the Board to present a new location for this dumpster. At this time the Chairperson said the Board needs to know what is going to happen in respect to the Plaza next to Building B. Does not approve of a revision to the Site Plan which leaves Building B at the current size. Should applicant wish to have that done, a comprehensive plan will need to be given to explain what is going to be built (i.e. size and description of what it is going to be). As to signage, Chairperson Neuer recommended approving as part of the Resolution however, a timetable is needed in respect to the sign that was supposed to be removed and a timetable for

going to be). As to signage, Chairperson Neuer recommended approving as part of the Resolution however, a timetable is needed in respect to the sign that was supposed to be removed and a timetable for the installation of the modernized sign at the main entrance.