Supporting Documentation · Date unavailable
PB-24-03 Crystal Eagle LLC - B: 111 L: 108 Z B-2
6e445c7d1818529bcc73d7e56030c76a4acab900d003f72ecba5f4ba4b598b05Indexed text · page 5
Show all pages24. As to design comment #14 (Hess report), Applicant believes the most of the potential tenants to the site would not require a loading dock and Applicant agreed to a condition to return to the Board for site plan review should a proposed tenant need a loading space. 25. As to design comment #17 regarding access to Crystal Lake, Applicant provided testimony that lot 1.01 fronts on Crystal Lake and not the lot owned by Applicant (lot 1.08), therefore, Applicant has no control over access to the lake. 26. As to design comment #8 regarding feasibility of providing a sidewalk along the stem from Eagle Rock Avenue to the building, the Applicant provided testimony that the stem is only 60 feet wide which just allows for angle parking spaces and no additional space for a sidewalk. 27. The Application requires the following variance relief from the Board: SECTION/REQUIREMENT | REQUIRED | EXISTING PROPOSED 25.71 Maximum lot coverage | 50% 86.6% 82,1% 25-12.10. Maximum parking | 20 spaces >20 spaces 38 spaces row length without landscaped island In addition, the Applicant is seeking relief from Ordinance Section 25-12.3, which requires at least one loading space for certain commercial uses. The Applicant is requesting relief to the extent that the eventual tenant is for a use that requires a loading space under the Ordinance. However, if the eventual tenant desires to have a loading space, the Applicant (or tenant) shall come back to the Board for amended site plan approval. 28. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46.1. and NJ.S.A. 40:55D-5 govern the Board’s review of the minor site plan application. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-5 defines “minor site plan” as a development plan of one or more lots which (1) proposes new development within the scope of a development {Cyrstal Eagle Draft Resolution}
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
6e445c7d18184,863,891 bytes