February 12, 2025 Planning Board Special Meeting Minutes

property. Mr. Cokeley said yes. Mr. Simon asked are you familiar with the 2024 survey from Osterkorn because you refer to it on your plan. Mr. Cokeley said yes. Mr. Simon asked does the survey that you rely on shows the discharge point of the channel entering the newly installed 36-inch pipe. Mr. Cokeley said it shows the channel ending at the 36-inch pipe. Mr. Simon asked do you know the extent of which that area is encumbered by steep slope disturbances. Mr. Cokeley said no. Mr. Simon asked based on the 2024 survey, the 36-inch pipe is approximately 70 feet long with a slope greater than 8%. Mr. Cokeley said he doesn’t know. Mr. Simon asked the proposal is that the slope length and conditions of the drainage channel have been changed from what you saw on the Matarazzo plans. Mr. Cokeley said the Matarazzo plan he was using was to get information about the dry well system. Mr. Simon asked do you recall submitting a memo to the board dated July 19", 2024, Mr. Cokeley said he remembers a memo. Mr. Simon asked is it relevant to this application. Mr. Cokeley said it is not part of this application. Mr. Simon asked if in your July 19", 2024 memo, it stated you would study storm water from both your client’s property as well as the Crystal Point property. Mr. Cokeley said he doesn’t remember. Mr. Simon asked the Crystal Point water is not going to be mitigated in any way by the proposed storm water system, correct. Mr. Cokeley said correct. Mr. Simon asked did you investigate whether the ditch location was different than what you have put on your Collier’s plan. Mr. Cokeley said no, he visited the site and confirmed the conditions that were on the survey. Mr. Simon asked in preparation for tonight’s proceeding did you go through and review the about 1000 documents that are now comprised as part of the record of this proceeding including documents that are linked on the agenda for tonight’s hearing. Mr. Cokeley said no. Mr. Simon asked with regard to the 36-inch pipe, you have not performed any type of evaluation of any erosion caused by water coming out of the pipe, correct. Mr. Cokeley said no. Mr. Simon asked the 2 12-inch clay pipe, were they identified on either your plans, the Matarazzo plans or the Osterkorn survey. Mr. Cokeley said no those were part of Mr. Cohn’s testimony with the images he shared last hearing. Mr. Simon asked you don’t

tified on either your plans, the Matarazzo plans or the Osterkorn survey. Mr. Cokeley said no those were part of Mr. Cohn’s testimony with the images he shared last hearing. Mr. Simon asked you don’t know as the engineer on the project where the 2 12-inch pipes were located. Mr. Cokeley said correct. Mr. Simon asked if you remove the 36-inch pipe, what would you put in its place. Mr. Cokeley said what Ms. Triolo referred to it being removed was the scour wall and the outlet control structure that are proposed on the plan. The pipes are not proposed as part of the plan. Mr. Simon asked when did you first become involve with the project. Mr. Cokeley said middle of 2024. Mr. Simon asked were you given any information about this site or documentation. Mr. Cokeley said yes. Mr. Simon asked who provided that information. Mr. Cokeley said the applicant. Mr. Simon asked did the applicant provide you any information that indicated that the 36- inch pipe was approved as installed. Mr. Cokeley said he saw the SCD requirement and.