July 16, 2025, Planning Board Special Meeting Transcript - WEHI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 basically assumed that the bedrock on this site going down the site was a solid mass of, of the Preakness Formation, which is basalt on this site. And we went all the way down the hill and there was no change to that bedrock quality or anything. But when you look at the table, if you go to Page 2 of this document, you can go there. No, wrong page. Right there. So -- MR. AFRAN: Can we zoom in more. Or enlarge it. MR. FAGAN: I cannot. A. So highlighted in red is boring LB-3. LB-3 is identified as cross section B on the plans. If you review the Langan report, they took it basically above the top of the slope and so they took these bores and they got these rock quality designations, as you see on the right, 67 and 77. And they ended up choosing the, it looks like they ended up choosing the 67 in order to determine the overall quality of this material which then translated to the competency of the rock. But when you look down, if you go to, for example cross section C NLB-1 shows, which is at the, basically down slope in the middle of the slope, their rock quality designation is zero. Meaning they didn't get any material that was long enough to count toward that rock quality designation which illustrates that this material is