August 13 2025, Planning Board Special Meeting Transcript - WEHI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 topographic information and CAD. We reviewed it, it was essentially the same as we would expect it to be and then we input that into the geometry of the slopes and then took the boring data that they provided in those locations and entered them into the program, to make sure that we were running a similar model or a similar analysis. We simply just accepted on our first run, based on our geometry, just to sort of like a test to make sure that we're kind of talking the same language in terms of the analysis. We put their same exact parameters in. And so for example, on Figure 1 that you might look at, we got a factor of safety 1.589 in the worst case scenario and they had a factor of safety of 1.599. For all intents and purposes that's the same, that's for Section C. And then for Section D similar analysis. We came up with a factor of safety of 1.936 and they came -- they had developed a factor of safety of 1.938. That's assuming, again, we're using their data. And we're just using that to corroborate our -- the layout of our model to make sure it's the same. MR. PLOCKER: I'm going to object just for the record. It looks like the notation, the caption at the bottom of the exhibit, it looks like it's reversed. It says that Langan was on top and Princeton Hydro is on