August 25, 2025, Planning Board Special Meeting Transcript - WEHI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 88 better idea what should have been there or what should be done, first of all Second of all, this is private property, this isn't up for -- this isn't conservation property. Its owned by an individual who wants to develop it and has the ordinance that establishes that he can develop it, they can develop it in accordance with that ordinance. So I think we're going back to the genesis of the ordinance and whether it was good planning or not and that's not what the board can do. The board is only listening to whether this application satisfies the ordinance and whether there are certain things about this application that just can't be done or which will facilitate this project under the case law. If something is being presented and there's no information whatsoever provided in the record that water came onto this site or that certain aspects of, that you couldn't get electricity out there. That it was to remote. That's not what we're dealing with this witness. I don't -- you have to give us a proffer as too why this is related to what the board is allowed to consider. MR. AFRAN: Let me respond then, I appreciate those comments. First of all, just because the developer owns land and just because the developer has the right to develop, does not mean the developer