Minutes · Sep 3, 2025
September 3, 2025 Planning Board Regular Meeting Transcript - WEHI
47b2acfdea8871712f9440b8d1cc96ebcdcbd1b543faba9a727512575efabc4dIndexed text · page 40
Show all pages1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 40 stations that have to be input as part of the application. So all these things are missing and if they're missing the board can't really give them a vote to say that this is an acceptable thing. You have to really go through ADA on some of them and they don't give variances in the ADA for sidewalk locations and that. And they're not there. The sidewalks are called for in RSIS on both sides of the street because of the density. And the density is medium to heavy, depending upon the amount of land that's going to be dedicated as open space. So it's the open space area in the, minimized in dedication. Creates a medium density but if -- but the sidewalks are so short and comply that it doesn't make any difference, they still need the same amount of sidewalk on the medium density for the roadway width as you do normally. So it doesn't really say that it's going to give you a way out by having a medium or high density. And back in the memo I wrote down under attachment B a list of discrepancies from where there are problems where the RSIS is not met. The RSIS requirements are not met. And to tell you truth in all honesty in the all years that I've been practicing, I've never seen an application so incomplete before. Missing so many things for completion where there's no, there's
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
47b2acfdea88855,069 bytes