September 3, 2025 Planning Board Regular Meeting Transcript - WEHI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 56 permitted by the ADA? A. Either that or it would require ramping in cases. Q. Can you point to a particular section of the ADA to support that statement? That's okay. That's okay. MR. PLOCKER: I have nothing further at this time. CHAIRMAN BAGOFF: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Klein. MR. KLEIN: Good evening, Mr. Litwornia. Sir, you said that the traffic signal at Oval Road is not warranted or what -- I wrote down a bunch of notes about, you didn't think it was warranted or it wasn't designed. That's where your main contention is, that they don't have an actual plan that shows the design? THE WITNESS: It's not designed, it's not included in -- could you repeat the question. MR. KLEIN: So when you were talking about the traffic signal at Oval Road -- THE WITNESS: Yes. MR. KLEIN: -- in the Langan report dated June 19, 2024, they did a warrant study. They met the eight-hour warrant, the four-hour warrant and the peak-hour warrant. Are you contesting that that's not accurate? That the signal is not warranted.