Minutes · Sep 3, 2025
September 3, 2025 Planning Board Regular Meeting Transcript - WEHI
47b2acfdea8871712f9440b8d1cc96ebcdcbd1b543faba9a727512575efabc4dIndexed text · page 60
Show all pages1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 60 than a thousand feet with no intersecting roadways, are there? THE WITNESS: That would be the maximum length of cul-de-sac and there would have to be another lane. MR. KLEIN: Like for instance, I'm looking at what they're proposing, they've got, I mean, I don't know what I'm looking at here. But, all right. And -- all right. So MUTCD says that traffic signals should not be spaced at a thousand feet. They should be -- what's the minimum spacing of two traffic signals? THE WITNESS: What is it? MR. KLEIN: What does MUTCD say about the spacing of the existing signal at Laurel, what's the closest you can have another signal on Eagle Rock? THE WITNESS: A thousand feet. MR. KLEIN: And we're at 750? THE WITNESS: Yeah. MR. KLEIN: So it says that it's not permitted or discourages it? THE WITNESS: It says that you can not use -- you can not use certain things in your justification. One of the things you can't use in justification is that it will provide a coordination of signals and if you're using a coordination of signals as part of your
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
47b2acfdea88855,069 bytes