September 17, 2025, Planning Board Special Meeting Transcript - WEHI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 80 generate about 776 vehicles per day below that standard and could stand alone without that emergency access. I am not advocating for the elimination of that access, I'm just pointing it out that we could live without it if this board so determined, but I think it is an advantage to both the community that it is being built as well as the existing community to maintain that. And to be clear, it's an emergency access. The fact is it will probably see some pedestrians, it'll see a snowplow. The likelihood that it'll ever see an emergency vehicle or any kind of traffic is very, very small. Just as the likelihood as the existing emergency access connection that people in this room may or may not know exists on Oval Road probably hasn't seen much more than a snowplow through the years. And that's the purpose of an emergency access. It's there if it's needed and can be used by emergency services however they need to respond. So that larger segment being said, which is most important, there's certainly no restriction on the number of units based upon RSIS on this site. Mr. Litwornia also went on to assert a few other things. He indicated that in his review of the plans, and he wasn't clear which plans he reviewed, that Mr. Anderson had violated the RSIS standard designs for