September 17, 2025, Planning Board Special Meeting Transcript - WEHI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 83 all of our calculations to a simplistic rating of A to F. A being excellent levels of service and operation. And F being failing conditions. Doesn't mean gridlock, it just means you might show up at a signal at the end of a cycle and have to wait a cycle to get through or you might be in a que of three or four, five vehicles at an unsignalized intersection, but bottom line, it's delays that are a little less tolerable to residents. The fact of the matter is the intersection calculations that we provided in the analysis show that that intersection will operate at the A level of service during both peak hours. He also inferred that our analysis did not consider the fact that we do need to coordinate the signals with Laurel Avenue. That is untrue. If he had reviewed our analysis documented in the report, he would have seen the analysis, that the analysis specifically considered a coordinated system. It incorporates the anticipated offset will be designed and that level of service A reflects that coordination and operation. Lastly Mr. Litwornia with regard to the signal referred that I'm violating some type of the law in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices with regard to spacing. He suggested the signal is 400 feet from Laurel Avenue. It is not 400 feet, it is actually