September 17, 2025, Planning Board Special Meeting Transcript - WEHI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 87 one side. If you recall the proofs, I'll give them to you again, with regard to Road D it's simple. We have two sidewalks that connect the community from the amenity building and the other buildings to Road D. Mr. Anderson just opted to take that sidewalk and rather run the lengthy route along the second side of the road, he put a direct route, ADA compliant path between Building D and the amenities. So it is a better use of sidewalk and pavement area for that connection. With regard to the connection down Warner Drive, as I testified to we have three sidewalks that run down to the adjacent community. Two along Kuzik all the way down the property line and one along Warner. I would respectfully suggest that provides more than adequate pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent community that has no sidewalks and there is no point of destination on the side of -- the side the road of Warner Road that pedestrians would want to get to. So I think this board is well within it's right to recognize and grant that de minimis exception and I would support that it is not, and give it the and/or change, but robust walking paths that are provided within this site. So I thought that was important to revisit. We did agree with him on that and we did provide the proofs for that. Mr. Litwornia went on to discuss parking to a